DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Hits 1 – 11 of 11

1
The dynamic nature of speech perception
In: Language and Speech, vol. 49(2006), p. 101-112 (2006)
MPI für Psycholinguistik
2
Lexically guided retuning of letter perception
In: The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol. 59(2006), p. 1505-1515 (2006)
MPI für Psycholinguistik
Show details
3
Are there really interactive processes in speech perception ?
In: Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 10(2006), p. 533 (2006)
MPI für Psycholinguistik
4
Phonological abstraction in the mental lexicon
In: Cognitive Science, vol. 30(2006), p. 1113-1126 (2006)
MPI für Psycholinguistik
5
Phonological abstraction in the mental lexicon
In: Cognitive science. - Hoboken, NJ : Wiley-Blackwell 30 (2006) 6, 1113-1126
BLLDB
OLC Linguistik
Show details
6
The dynamic nature of speech perception
In: Language and speech. - London [u.a.] : Sage Publ. 49 (2006) 1, 101-112
BLLDB
OLC Linguistik
Show details
7
Are there really interactive processes in speech perception?
McQueen, James M.; Cutler, Anne; Norris, Dennis. - : U.K, Elsevier, 2006
BASE
Show details
8
The dynamic nature of speech perception
McQueen, James M.; Norris, Dennis; Cutler, Anne. - : U.K, Kingston Press Services, 2006
BASE
Show details
9
Phonological abstraction in the mental lexicon
McQueen, James M.; Cutler, Anne; Norris, Dennis. - : U.K, Elsevier, 2006
BASE
Show details
10
Phonological and conceptual activation in speech comprehension
Norris, Dennis; Cutler, Anne; McQueen, James M.. - : U.S.A, Academic Press, 2006
BASE
Show details
11
Lexically-guided retuning of letter perception
Norris, Dennis; Butterfield, Sally; McQueen, James M.; Cutler, Anne. - : U.K, Psychology Press, 2006
Abstract: Participants made visual lexical decisions to upper-case words and nonwords, and then categorized an ambiguous N–H letter continuum. The lexical decision phase included different exposure conditions: Some participants saw an ambiguous letter “?”, midway between N and H, in N-biased lexical contexts (e.g., REIG?), plus words with unambiguous H (e.g., WEIGH); others saw the reverse (e.g., WEIG?, REIGN). The first group categorized more of the test continuum as N than did the second group. Control groups, who saw “?” in nonword contexts (e.g., SMIG?), plus either of the unambiguous word sets (e.g., WEIGH or REIGN), showed no such subsequent effects. Perceptual learning about ambiguous letters therefore appears to be based on lexical knowledge, just as in an analogous speech experiment (Norris, McQueen, & Cutler, 2003) which showed similar lexical influence in learning about ambiguous phonemes. We argue that lexically guided learning is an efficient general strategy available for exploitation by different specific perceptual tasks.
Keyword: 200499 - Linguistics not elsewhere classified; cognition; learning; letters; lexical access; perception; speech
URL: http://handle.uws.edu.au:8081/1959.7/34590
https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210600739494
BASE
Hide details

Catalogues
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
Bibliographies
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
5
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern