| 1 |
Risk in War: Using History to Inform a Common Method for Understanding and Communicating Risk in Joint Operations
|
|
|
|
In: DTIC (2013)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 2 |
Processes for Assessing Outcomes of Multi-national Missions (Processus d'evaluation des resultats de missions multinationales)
|
|
Banko, Katherine M; Berggren, Peter; Eikelboom, Aletta R; Estabrooke, Ivy V; Howard, Trevor; Lau, Roman; Marklund, Jenny; Marklund, Joakim; Roman, Elmer L; Williams, Andy
|
|
In: DTIC (2013)
|
|
Abstract:
Multi-national missions require comprehensive assessment that measures the impact of military and civilian actions on opposing forces and the local population. In order to identify and characterize limitations of current assessments and identify best practices, this NATO RTG task group examined current measurement and assessment practices by NATO members in current and recent theatres of operations. The task group also conducted a preliminary study to identify a potential set of core indicators that could provide a high-level assessment of macro change over time to compliment campaign assessments aimed at specific interventions. These core indicators, if used to assess all missions, would allow for cross-mission comparison, a capability that currently does not exist. Based on the findings, the task group recommends that NATO develop the policies, plans, infrastructure and procedures to successfully conduct comprehensive assessments. In order to do this NATO must develop standard assessment procedures and frameworks for use throughout NATO/ISAF and other multi-national operations. This includes common lexicons and definitions used by member nations and a core set of metrics to supplement campaign measures of performance (MOPs) and measures of effectiveness (MOEs) and allow for comparisons between NATO missions. ; Findings of Task Group HFM-185.
|
|
Keyword:
*JOINT MILITARY ACTIVITIES; *METRICS; Administration and Management; ASSESSMENT PRACTICES; BEST PRACTICES; COMPARISON; FH(FREEDOM HOUSE); FOREIGN REPORTS; INTERVIEWING; MEASUREMENT; MILITARY FORCES(FOREIGN); MILITARY FORCES(UNITED STATES); Military Operations; MILITARY RESEARCH; MISSIONS; MOE(MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS); MOP(MEASURES OF PERFORMANCE); MULTI-NATIONAL OPERATIONS; NATO FORCES; NATO FURNISHED; NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS; STANDARDIZATION; Strategy and Tactics; UNESCO(UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANISATION); WHO(WORLD HEALTH ORGANISATION); WORLD BANK
|
|
URL: http://www.dtic.mil/docs/citations/ADA592246
http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?&verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADA592246
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 3 |
Pursuing the Human Domain Risks Reinvesting on the Basics
|
|
|
|
In: DTIC (2013)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 4 |
Controlled English for Effective Communication during Coalition Operations
|
|
|
|
In: DTIC (2013)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 5 |
Conveying the Complex: Updating U.S. Joint Systems Analysis Doctrine with Complexity Theory
|
|
|
|
In: DTIC (2013)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 6 |
Impacts of Worldview, Implicit Assumptions, Biases, and Groupthink on Israeli Operational Plans in 1973
|
|
|
|
In: DTIC (2013)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 7 |
Multinational Intelligence Issues: What the Operational Commander Can Do To Mitigate Them
|
|
|
|
In: DTIC (2013)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 8 |
Cultural Competence and the Operational Level of War
|
|
|
|
In: DTIC (2013)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 9 |
The Center of Gravity Concept: A Study of Its Description and Application in Two Different Eras
|
|
|
|
In: DTIC (2013)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 10 |
Interacting with Multi-Robot Systems Using BML
|
|
|
|
In: DTIC (2013)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
