DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Hits 1 – 6 of 6

1
Best practice ideas for learner advising in New Zealand
Hobbs, Moira; Dofs, Kerstin. - : Self-Access Learning Centre (SALC) Kanda University of International Studies (Chiba, Japan), 2016
BASE
Show details
2
Best practice ideas for learner advising in New Zealand
Hobbs, Moira; Dofs, Kerstin. - : Self-Access Learning Centre (SALC) Kanda University of International Studies (Chiba, Japan), 2016
BASE
Show details
3
Language shift and maintenance in the Korean community in Australia
Jung, SJ; Shin, S-C. - : International Foundation for Korean Language and Culture Education, 2016
BASE
Show details
4
English L1-Korean L2 learners’ cognitive knowledge and difficulty of grammatical error items
Shin, S-C. - : Institute of Language and Information Studies Yonsei University, 2016
BASE
Show details
5
Heritage language learning: A needs analysis study on Korean-Australian tertiary students
Shin, S-C; KO, S; Rue, YJ. - : The International Association for Korean Language Education, 2016
BASE
Show details
6
Patterns of Errors in Compositions of Korean Learners of Filipino Language
Laranjo, R; Shin, S-C. - : The Korean Association of Southeast Asian Studies, 2016
Abstract: The study analyzes errors produced by Korean learners of the Filipino language in their written compositions, presents types and categories of the errors and provides some possible explanations for the cause of errors. The study has conducted a survey and collected 35 written compositions from three different groups (Beginner, Intermediate and Advanced) learning Filipino at three universities in Manila. A total of 213 errors from 349 sentences were analyzed. Errors were classified at three linguistic levels (orthographic, morphological and syntactic) and categorized into five types such as omission, addition, misselection, misorder and blend. It has been revealed that the largest proportion of errors was from morphological misselection at all proficiency levels: Beginner (59.3%), Intermediate (73.4%) and Advanced (77.8%), followed by morphological omission. Types of errors are presented along with examples and possible sources of errors are explained. It has turned out that there were more intralingual errors interlingual than errors at all levels and implications of these errors in teaching are discussed.
Keyword: 200314 South-East Asian Languages (excl. Indonesian); 200401 Applied Linguistics and Educational Linguistics; composition; error analysis; error pattern; error type; Filipino; Korean learner; second language
URL: http://handle.unsw.edu.au/1959.4/unsworks_42506
http://www.kaseas.org/?mid=sea0501&category=54138
https://doi.org/10.21652/kaseas.26.4.201611.365
BASE
Hide details

Catalogues
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Bibliographies
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
6
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern