1 |
СОВРЕМЕННАЯ ЕКСПЛИКАЦИЯ АНАЛИТИЧЕСКОЙ ФИЛОСОФИИ ПРАВА Г. ХАРТА
|
|
ТАТАРОВСКИЙ Р.О.. - : Институт права и психологии Национального университета «Львовская политехника», 2016
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
Knowledge and its Game-Theoretical Foundations: The Challenges of the Dialogical Approach to Constructive Type Theory
|
|
|
|
In: Epistemology, Knowledge and the Impact of Interaction ; https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01227833 ; Epistemology, Knowledge and the Impact of Interaction, Springer, 2016 ; http://www.springer.com/us/book/9783319265049 (2016)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Message Exchange Games in Strategic Contexts
|
|
|
|
In: ISSN: 0022-3611 ; EISSN: 1573-0433 ; Journal of Philosophical Logic ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02397258 ; Journal of Philosophical Logic, Springer Verlag, 2016, 46 (4), pp.355-494. ⟨10.1007/s10992-016-9402-1⟩ (2016)
|
|
Abstract:
International audience ; When two people engage in a conversation, knowingly or unknowingly, they are playing a game. Players of such games have diverse objectives, or winning conditions: an applicant trying to convince her potential employer of her eligibility over that of a competitor, a prosecutor trying to convict a defendant, a politician trying to convince an electorate in a political debate, and so on. We argue that infinitary games offer a natural model for many structural characteristics of such conversations. We call such games message exchange games, and we compare them to existing game theoretic frameworks used in linguistics—for example, signaling games—and show that message exchange games are needed to handle non-cooperative conversation. In this paper, we concentrate on conversational games where players’ interests are opposed. We provide a taxonomy of conversations based on their winning conditions, and we investigate some essential features of winning conditions like consistency and what we call rhetorical cooperativity. We show that these features make our games decomposition sensitive, a property we define formally in the paper. We show that this property has far-reaching implications for the existence of winning strategies and their complexity. There is a class of winning conditions (decomposition invariant winning conditions) for which message exchange games are equivalent to Banach- Mazur games, which have been extensively studied and enjoy nice topological results. But decomposition sensitive goals are much more the norm and much more interesting linguistically and philosophically.
|
|
Keyword:
[INFO.INFO-CL]Computer Science [cs]/Computation and Language [cs.CL]; Dialogue; Game theory; Philosophy of language; Strategic reasoning
|
|
URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-016-9402-1 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02397258 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02397258/document https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02397258/file/asher_22177.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
4 |
Interactions in Complex Systems
|
|
|
|
In: https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01377409 ; 2016 (2016)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
Quelques ponts entre sémantique opérationnelle et modèles dénotationnels des langages de programmation
|
|
|
|
In: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01400666 ; Logique en informatique [cs.LO]. Université Grenoble Alpes, 2016 (2016)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Géopolitique des langues romanes ; The geopolitics of Romance languages
|
|
|
|
In: Hermès [ISSN 0767-9513], Langues romanes : un milliard de locuteurs ; 2016, 75, p. 27 (2016)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
Proceedings Fifteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
Efficient Reallocation under Additive and Responsive Preferences ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
The Importance of Why: An Intelligence Approach for a Multi-Polar World
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
Social niche construction and evolutionary transitions in individuality.
|
|
|
|
In: Biology and Philosophy, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 59-79 (2016)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
Evolution of mindsight and psychological commitment among strategically interacting agents
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|