1 |
‘Now that’s the feedback I want!’ Students’ reactions to feedback on graded work and what they do with it
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
Making and shaping the first Nishkam Nursery: a linguistic ethnographic study of a British Sikh project for childhood
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
The teaching of reading English in a foreign language in Libyan universities: methods and models
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Towards an understanding of Pakistani undergraduates’ current attitudes towards learning and speaking English
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
Difficulties Encountered by Libyan University Students of English as a Foreign Language in the Use of Lexical Collocations
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
Are Graded Lesson Observations the "Elephant" in Our Classrooms? An Exploration into the Views of In-Service Teacher Trainees on Lesson Observations
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
The Impact of Primary Teachers' Pedagogical Knowledge and Autonomy on the Teaching of Early Reading
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
Defining Criterial Approaches at C1: an approach
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
This paper focuses on the question of where we are now with our understanding of the C1 level of the Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR). The CEFR has had a dramatic impact on the fields of English language teaching and testing. The project which is the topic of this paper hoped to bring clarity to our understanding of an under-specified and under-described level (Green, 2012). This new understanding could aid test developers when creating tests. The project was based on the British Council/EAQUALS Core Inventory of General English (henceforth Core Inventory). The Core Inventory was an attempt to match language points with CEFR levels. The current project aimed to provide data-based evidence conducted with learners to support an existing theoretical work. MA TESOL students with IELTS score of 6.5 or above were invited to take a test of written and spoken English. The scripts were analysed with ATLAS.ti software to identify which of the features described as core in the Core Inventory were found in the scripts and with what level of frequency. The software was used on both the written and audio data. The language points which could be considered criterial tended to be those relating to argumentation and expressing feelings and attitudes precisely. There is some evidence to suggest that giving advice could be considered to be criterial. Perhaps the significance of the project lies in the creation of an approach to identifying criterial features using the Core Inventory.
|
|
Keyword:
L Education (General)
|
|
URL: http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/31063/ http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/31063/1/BAAL2016AngliaRuskin.pptx
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
12 |
On Demand: Exploring the Potential of Electronic Feedback on Assessment Performance
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
Evaluating the use of lecture capture using a revealed preference approach
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
Singing from the same hymn sheet? What language assessment literacy means to teachers
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
A corpus-based study of academic-collocation use and patterns in postgraduate Computer Science students’ writing
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
A computer-aided error analysis of Saudi students’ written English and an evaluation of the efficacy of using the data- driven learning approach to teach collocations and lexical phrases
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
19 |
Correlations between learning styles and perceptions of Collaborative Learning in Higher Education
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
20 |
Creativity and Conflict: Student responses to WW1 then and now
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|