| 2 |
Variation and change in the use of hestitation markers in Germanic languages ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 3 |
Variation and change in the use of hestitation markers in Germanic languages ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 4 |
Variation and change in the use of hesitation markers in Germanic languages
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 5 |
Understanding U.S. regional linguistic variation with Twitter data analysis
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
We analyze a Big Data set of geo-tagged tweets for a year (Oct. 2013–Oct. 2014) to understand the regional linguistic variation in the U.S. Prior work on regional linguistic variations usually took a long time to collect data and focused on either rural or urban areas. Geo-tagged Twitter data offers an unprecedented database with rich linguistic representation of fine spatiotemporal resolution and continuity. From the one-year Twitter corpus, we extract lexical characteristics for twitter users by summarizing the frequencies of a set of lexical alternations that each user has used. We spatially aggregate and smooth each lexical characteristic to derive county-based linguistic variables, from which orthogonal dimensions are extracted using the principal component analysis (PCA). Finally a regionalization method is used to discover hierarchical dialect regions using the PCA components. The regionalization results reveal interesting linguistic regional variations in the U.S. The discovered regions not only confirm past research findings in the literature but also provide new insights and a more detailed understanding of very recent linguistic patterns in the U.S.
|
|
URL: https://publications.aston.ac.uk/id/eprint/40100/1/US_regional_linguistic_variation_with_Twitter_data_analysis.pdf
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2015.12.003
https://publications.aston.ac.uk/id/eprint/40100/
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
|
|
