| 12 |
Generating References in Naturalistic Face-to-Face and Phone-Mediated Dialog Settings
|
|
|
|
In: ISSN: 1756-8757 ; EISSN: 1756-8765 ; Topics in cognitive science ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02370813 ; Topics in cognitive science, Wiley, 2016, 8 (4), pp.796-818. ⟨10.1111/tops.12218⟩ (2016)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 13 |
A Cognitive Overview of Limb Apraxia
|
|
|
|
In: ISSN: 1534-6293 ; Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports ; https://hal.univ-lille.fr/hal-02391914 ; Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, 2016, Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, 16 (8), pp.75. ⟨10.1007/s11910-016-0675-0⟩ (2016)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 14 |
The Diversity of Religious Systems Across History: An Evolutionary Cognitive Approach
|
|
|
|
In: The Oxford Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology and Religion ; https://jeannicod.ccsd.cnrs.fr/ijn_03065834 ; James R. Liddle; Todd K. Shackelford. The Oxford Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology and Religion, Oxford University Press, 2016, ⟨10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199397747.013.5⟩ (2016)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 15 |
A Bilingual Graph-Based Semantic Model for Statistical Machine Translation
|
|
|
|
In: International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01359476 ; International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Jul 2016, New York, United States (2016)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 16 |
Dissociating language-switch costs from cue-switch costs in bilingual language switching
|
|
|
|
In: ISSN: 1366-7289 ; EISSN: 1469-1841 ; Bilingualism: Language and Cognition ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01432303 ; Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2016, 19 (5), pp.921-927. ⟨10.1017/S1366728916000456⟩ (2016)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 17 |
Abstract Dialectical Frameworks for Text Exploration
|
|
|
|
In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence (ICAART-2016) ; https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01333347 ; Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence (ICAART-2016), Feb 2016, Rome, Italy (2016)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 18 |
An independent, landmark-dominated head-direction signal in dysgranular retrosplenial cortex
|
|
|
|
In: ISSN: 1097-6256 ; EISSN: 1546-1726 ; Nature Neuroscience ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01664366 ; Nature Neuroscience, Nature Publishing Group, 2016, 20 (2), pp.173-175. ⟨10.1038/nn.4465⟩ (2016)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 19 |
Speech reductions cause a de-weighting of secondary acoustic cues
|
|
|
|
In: Interspeech 2016 ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01363642 ; Interspeech 2016, Sep 2016, San Francisco, United States. ⟨10.21437/Interspeech.2016-343⟩ (2016)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 20 |
Context in Generalized Conversational Implicatures: the case of some
|
|
|
|
In: ISSN: 1664-1078 ; Frontiers in Psychology ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01582067 ; Frontiers in Psychology, Frontiers, 2016, ⟨10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00381⟩ (2016)
|
|
Abstract:
International audience ; There is now general agreement about the optionality of scalar implicatures: the pragmatic interpretation will be accessed depending on the context relative to which the utterance is interpreted. The question, then, is what makes a context upper- (vs. lower-) bounding. Neo-Gricean accounts should predict that contexts including factual information will enhance the rate of pragmatic interpretations. Post-Gricean accounts should predict that contexts including psychological attributions will enhance the rate of pragmatic interpretations. We tested two factors using the quantifier scale : (1) the existence of factual information that facilitates the computation of pragmatic interpretations in the context (here, the cardinality of the domain of quantification) and (2) the fact that the context makes the difference between the semantic and the pragmatic interpretations of the target sentence relevant, involving psychological attributions to the speaker (here a question using all). We did three experiments, all of which suggest that while cardinality information may be necessary to the computation of the pragmatic interpretation, it plays a minor role in triggering it; highlighting the contrast between the pragmatic and the semantic interpretations, while it is not necessary to the computation of the pragmatic interpretation, strongly mandates a pragmatic interpretation. These results favor Sperber and Wilson's (1995) post-Gricean account over Chierchia's (2013) neo-Gricean account. Overall, this suggests that highlighting the relevance of the pragmatic vs. semantic interpretations of the target sentence makes a context upper-bounding. Additionally, the results give a small advantage to the post-Gricean account.
|
|
Keyword:
[SCCO]Cognitive science
|
|
URL: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01582067
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00381
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
|
|
