DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Hits 1 – 5 of 5

1
Ontological categories
In: Baunaz, Lena; Lander, Eric (2018). Ontological categories. : LingBuzz. (2018)
BASE
Show details
2
Deconstructing categories syncretic with the nominal complementizer
In: Baunaz, Lena; Lander, Eric (2018). Deconstructing categories syncretic with the nominal complementizer. Glossa, 3(1):1-27. (2018)
BASE
Show details
3
Decomposing complementizers: the fseq of French, Modern Greek, Serbo-Croatian and Bulgarian complementizers
In: Baunaz, Lena (2018). Decomposing complementizers: the fseq of French, Modern Greek, Serbo-Croatian and Bulgarian complementizers. In: Baunaz, Lena; De Clercq, Karen; Haegeman, Liliane; Lander, Eric. Exploring Nanosyntax. New York: Oxford University Press, 149-179. (2018)
BASE
Show details
4
Syncretisms with the nominal complementizers
In: Baunaz, Lena; Lander, Eric (2018). Syncretisms with the nominal complementizers. Studia Linguistica. A Journal of General Linguistics, 72(3):537-570. (2018)
Abstract: Nominal complementizers (e.g. Eng. that, Fr. que) often have the same morphophonological form as other grammatical items, such as demonstrative, relative, and wh-pronouns. In this paper we treat such overlaps as instantiations of syncretism, and we discuss the different patterns of syncretism with the nominal complementizer in various languages. We treat the syncretism facts within a nanosyntactic framework (Starke 2009, Caha 2009), meaning that complementizers are not simplex heads of CP (or ForceP/FinP in Rizzi’s 1997 sense) but actually composed of multiple features, each feature corresponding to a head in a single functional sequence which is responsible for building demonstratives, complementizers, relativizers, and wh-pronouns (for alternative decompositions of complementizers in Romance, Balkan, and Germanic, see also Baunaz 2015, 2016, to appear Sanfelice & Poletto 2014; and Leu 2015, respectively). Interestingly, moreover, many of the languages under discussion show a bound morpheme appearing as an integral part of the internal morphological makeup of quantifiers. This bound morpheme may also be syncretic with the complementizer (Romance -que/-che, Serbo-Croatian -sto , Modern Greek -ti, Finnish -kin, and Hungarian ho-) or not (Germanic -thing/-ting, for which see also Leu 2005). We call this the ‘nominal core’ (n), and its behavior with regard to syncretism is crucial for determining the hierarchical ordering of the functional sequence.
Keyword: 410 Linguistics; 440 French & related languages; 450 Italian; 460 Spanish & Portuguese languages; 470 Latin & Italic languages; 800 Literature; Institute of Romance Studies; rhetoric & criticism; Romanian & related languages
URL: https://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/147528/1/Baunaz_et_al-2017-Studia_Linguistica.pdf
https://doi.org/10.1111/stul.12076
https://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/147528/
https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-147528
BASE
Hide details
5
Nanosyntax: the basics
In: Baunaz, Lena; Lander, Eric (2018). Nanosyntax: the basics. In: Baunaz, Lena; De Clercq, Karen; Haegeman, Liliane; Lander, Eric. Exploring Nanosyntax. New York: Oxford University Press, 3-56. (2018)
BASE
Show details

Catalogues
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Bibliographies
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
5
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern