| 1 |
A Two-Level Approach to Generate Synthetic Argumentation Reports
|
|
|
|
In: ISSN: 1946-2166 ; EISSN: 1946-2174 ; Argument and Computation ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02191823 ; Argument and Computation, Taylor & Francis, 2018, 18 years of Computational Models of Natural Argument, 9 (2), pp.137-154. ⟨10.3233/AAC-180035⟩ ; https://content.iospress.com/articles/argument-and-computation/aac035 (2018)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 2 |
Mining Incoherent Requirements in Technical Specifications: Analysis and Implementation
|
|
|
|
In: ISSN: 0169-023X ; Data and Knowledge Engineering ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02191825 ; Data and Knowledge Engineering, Elsevier, 2018, 117, pp.290-306. ⟨10.1016/j.datak.2018.05.006⟩ (2018)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 3 |
Investigating Argument Relatedness Based on Linguistic Knowledge
|
|
|
|
In: Proceedings of SEMAPRO 2018 ; 12th International Conference on Advances in Semantic Processing (SEMAPRO 2018) ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02181924 ; 12th International Conference on Advances in Semantic Processing (SEMAPRO 2018), Nov 2018, Athènes, Greece. pp.1-3 (2018)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 4 |
Evaluating the Strength of Arguments on the Basis of a Linguistic Analysis: A Synthesis
|
|
|
|
In: Proceedings of CMNA 2018 ; 18th Workshops on Computational Models of Natural Argumentation (CMNA 2018) ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02181939 ; 18th Workshops on Computational Models of Natural Argumentation (CMNA 2018), Apr 2018, Liverpool, United Kingdom. pp.32-39 ; http://cmna.info//CMNA18/ (2018)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 5 |
Investigating Argument Relatedness by Means of Frames
|
|
|
|
In: 16th ARGDIAP (Argumentation, Dialogue, Perssuiasion) conference: “Argumentation and Corpus Linguistics” - ARGDIAP 2018 ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03033967 ; 16th ARGDIAP (Argumentation, Dialogue, Perssuiasion) conference: “Argumentation and Corpus Linguistics” - ARGDIAP 2018, ArgDiaP association, a Polish nationwide initiative, Sep 2018, Varsovie, Poland. pp.(electronic medium) ; http://waw2018.argdiap.pl/argdiap-conference/ (2018)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 6 |
Exploring Argumentation Schemes Used in Discussing Controversial Social Issues
|
|
|
|
In: Workshop 2: Argumentation and Society (ArgSoc 2018) ; 7th International Conference on Computational Models of Argument workshops (COMMA 2018 workshops) ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03044248 ; 7th International Conference on Computational Models of Argument workshops (COMMA 2018 workshops), Institute for Philosophy and Sociology, Polish Academy of Sciences (IFiS PAN), Sep 2018, Varsovie, Poland. pp.(electronic medium) ; http://comma2018.argdiap.pl/workshops/workshop-2/ (2018)
|
|
Abstract:
International audience ; Argumentation schemes aim at representing the structure of common types of arguments used in everyday discourses. In addition to identifying a type of argumentation (e.g. "Argument from analogy,""Argument from expert opinion"), they also indicate generic version of the premise(s) and conclusion for each scheme. One of the most significant features of argumentation schemes is the inclusion of critical questions, that enable a respondent to question the content put forward by the proponent, and therefore lead to the validation or defeat of the argument; for example, for the scheme Argument from expert opinion, one of the critical questions is: "How credible is the expert cited as an expert source?". Modern research on argumentation schemes include defeasible arguments, i.e. arguments that are not strictly speaking logically valid, but are strong enough for their conclusion to be temporarily accepted, until further evidence can be put forward. These types of arguments are especially common in natural language.
|
|
Keyword:
[INFO]Computer Science [cs]; annotation; argument mining; argumentation schemes; linguistics; natural language processing
|
|
URL: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03044248
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
|
|
