| 1 |
A taxonomy of user guidance devices for e-lexicography
|
|
|
|
In: Lexicographica. Internationales Jahrbuch für Lexikographie. International annual for lexicography. Revue internationale de lexicographie 33 (2018), 391-422
|
|
IDS OBELEX meta
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 2 |
Monofunctional and polyfunctional information tools with an operative function
|
|
|
|
In: Lexicographica. Internationales Jahrbuch für Lexikographie. International annual for lexicography. Revue internationale de lexicographie 33 (2018), 361-390
|
|
IDS OBELEX meta
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 8 |
Authors of Authenticity: Translation and the Fairy Tale
|
|
|
|
In: Raleigh, Tegan Cathleen. (2018). Authors of Authenticity: Translation and the Fairy Tale. 0035: Comparative Literature. Retrieved from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/0mh0041c (2018)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 11 |
Translating identities : new words for old aspirations. The Catalan case
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 12 |
First language attrition and dominance: same same or different?
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
We explore the relationship between first language attrition and language dominance, defined here as the relative availability of each of a bilingual’s languages with respect to language processing. We assume that both processes might represent two stages of one and the same phenomenon (Schmid and Köpke, 2017; Köpke, 2018). While many researchers agree that language dominance changes repeatedly over the lifespan (e.g., Silva-Corvalan and Treffers-Daller, 2015), little is known about the precise time scales involved in dominance shifts and attrition. We investigate these time scales in a longitudinal case study of pronominal subject production by a near-native L2-German (semi-null subject and topic-drop but non-pro-drop) and L1-Bulgarian (pro-drop) bilingual speaker with 17 years of residence in Germany. This speaker’s spontaneous speech showed a significantly higher rate of overt pronominal subjects in her L1 than the controls’ rates when tested in Germany. After 3 weeks of L1-reexposure in Bulgaria, however, attrition effects disappeared and the overt subject rate fell within the monolinguals’ range (Genevska-Hanke, 2017). The findings of this first investigation are now compared to those of a second investigation 5 years later, involving data collection in both countries with the result that after 17 years of immigration, no further attrition was attested and the production of overt subjects remained monolinguallike for the data collections in both language environments. The discussion focuses on the factors that are likely to explain these results. First, these show that attrition and language dominance are highly dependent on immediate language use context and change rapidly when the language environment is modified. Additionally, the data obtained after L1-reexposure illustrate that time scales involved in dominance shift or attrition are much shorter than previously thought. Second, the role of age of acquisition in attrition has repeatedly been acknowledged. The present study demonstrates that attrition of a highly entrenched L1 is a phenomenon affecting language processing only temporarily and that it is likely to regress quickly after reexposure or return to balanced L1-use. The discussion suggests that dominance shift and attrition probably involve similar mechanisms and are influenced by the same external factors, showing that both may be different steps of the same process.
|
|
Keyword:
English; German
|
|
URL: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01963
http://oops.uni-oldenburg.de/4171/
http://oops.uni-oldenburg.de/4171/1/2018-068_koepcke_article_fpsyg-09-01963.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
|
|
