10 |
The Laboratory as an Ecology for Action: An Ethnomethodological Study of Agents and Objects in Genomic Research
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
The Laboratory as an Ecology for Action: An Ethnomethodological Study of Agents and Objects in Genomic Research
|
|
|
|
In: Everhart, Donald. (2018). The Laboratory as an Ecology for Action: An Ethnomethodological Study of Agents and Objects in Genomic Research. UC San Diego: Sociology (Science Studies). Retrieved from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/71h3c7sp (2018)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
Wissenschaft und Offenheit : Reflexion über Wissenschaft als Teil der Lehre zum wissenschaftlichen Arbeiten und Schreiben ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
The Laboratory as an Ecology for Action: An Ethnomethodological Study of Agents and Objects in Genomic Research
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
Hypothesis, analysis and synthesis: it’s all Greek to me! ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
Radical Social Ecology as Deep Pragmatism: A Call to the Abolition of Systemic Dissonance and the Minimization of Entropic Chaos
|
|
|
|
In: Student Theses 2015-Present (2018)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
La relación sujeto-objeto en la concepción kantiana de la ciencia ; The subject-object relationship in the Kantian conception of science
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
How to Insult and Compliment a Testifier
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
This article has been published in a revised form in Episteme, https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2016.39. This version is free to view and download for private research and study only. Not for re-distribution, re-sale or use in derivative works. © 2016 Cambridge University Press. ; Do we insult or slight a speaker when we reject her testimony? Do we compliment or commend her when we accept her testimony? This paper argues that the answer to both of these questions is yes, but only in some instances, since these respective insults and compliments track the reasons a hearer has for rejecting or accepting testimony. When disbelieving a speaker, a hearer may insult her because she judges the speaker to be either incompetent as a knower or insincere as a teller. By outlining the predominant reasons we have for rejecting testimony, I show how not every instance of rejecting testimony embodies this negative evaluation of the speaker. By contrast, testimonial compliments are fewer in number, and are not constitutive of everyday testimonial exchanges, since speakers who are competent as knowers and sincere as tellers are merely behaving correctly in accordance with the norms of testifying. Nevertheless, deferring to an authority on belief can be complimentary to that speaker if by doing so we judge her to have some mastery in a particular domain. This suggests an asymmetry between rejecting and accepting testimony. Testimonial insults and compliments also have important moral applications, particularly regarding epistemic injustice and therapeutic trust. ; Peer reviewed
|
|
Keyword:
History and Philosophy of Science
|
|
URL: https://www.research.manchester.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/how-to-insult-and-compliment-a-testifier(1cd8dcb7-e8ec-4524-93cf-42721d988265).html http://hdl.handle.net/2299/19978 http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84995393618&partnerID=8YFLogxK
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
18 |
AESTHETICS AND THE POWER OF STEAM
|
|
|
|
In: MESSENGER OF KYIV NATIONAL LINGUISTIC UNIVERSITY. Series Philology; Том 20, № 2 (2017); 43-53 ; ВІСНИК КИЇВСЬКОГО НАЦІОНАЛЬНОГО ЛІНГВІСТИЧНОГО УНІВЕРСИТЕТУ. Серія Філологія; Том 20, № 2 (2017); 43-53 ; 2415-7333 ; 2311-0821 (2018)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|