DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Page: 1 2
Hits 1 – 20 of 22

1
Truth and the world : an explanationist theory
Tallant, Jonathan. - New York : Routledge, 2018
BLLDB
UB Frankfurt Linguistik
Show details
2
Normative language policy : ethics, politics, principles
Peled, Yael; Oakes, Leigh. - Cambridge, United Kingdom : Cambridge University Press, 2018
BLLDB
UB Frankfurt Linguistik
Show details
3
The creole debate
McWhorter, John H.. - Cambridge, United Kingdom : Cambridge University Press, 2018
BLLDB
UB Frankfurt Linguistik
Show details
4
Kritik der reinen Theorie : logische Differenzen zwischen Wissenschaft und Weltanschauung
Stekeler, Pirmin. - Tübingen : Mohr Siebeck, 2018
BLLDB
UB Frankfurt Linguistik
Show details
5
Biolinguistic investigations and the formal language hierarchy
Uriagereka, Juan. - London : Routledge, 2018
BLLDB
UB Frankfurt Linguistik
Show details
6
Meaning and linguistic variation : the third wave in sociolinguistics
Eckert, Penelope. - Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2018
BLLDB
UB Frankfurt Linguistik
Show details
7
Linguistik und Hermeneutik : sprachtheoretische Aufsätze
Biere, Bernd Ulrich. - Brey : Mykum Verlag, 2018
BLLDB
UB Frankfurt Linguistik
Show details
8
Nature and necessity in Spinoza's philosophy
Garrett, Don. - New York City : Oxford University Press, 2018
BLLDB
UB Frankfurt Linguistik
Show details
9
Denkstile in der deutschen Sprachwissenschaft : Bausteine einer Fachgeschichte aus dem Blickwinkel der Wissenschaftstheorie Ludwik Flecks
Andersen, Christiane (Herausgeber); Fix, Ulla (Herausgeber); Schiewe, Jürgen (Herausgeber). - Berlin : Erich Schmidt Verlag, 2018
BDSL
BLLDB
UB Frankfurt Linguistik
Show details
10
The Laboratory as an Ecology for Action: An Ethnomethodological Study of Agents and Objects in Genomic Research
Everhart, Donald. - : eScholarship, University of California, 2018
BASE
Show details
11
The Laboratory as an Ecology for Action: An Ethnomethodological Study of Agents and Objects in Genomic Research
Everhart, Donald. - : eScholarship, University of California, 2018
In: Everhart, Donald. (2018). The Laboratory as an Ecology for Action: An Ethnomethodological Study of Agents and Objects in Genomic Research. UC San Diego: Sociology (Science Studies). Retrieved from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/71h3c7sp (2018)
BASE
Show details
12
Wissenschaft und Offenheit : Reflexion über Wissenschaft als Teil der Lehre zum wissenschaftlichen Arbeiten und Schreiben ...
Hapke, Thomas. - : De Gruyter, 2018
BASE
Show details
13
The Laboratory as an Ecology for Action: An Ethnomethodological Study of Agents and Objects in Genomic Research
Everhart, Donald. - : University of California, San Diego, 2018
BASE
Show details
14
Hypothesis, analysis and synthesis: it’s all Greek to me! ...
BASE
Show details
15
Radical Social Ecology as Deep Pragmatism: A Call to the Abolition of Systemic Dissonance and the Minimization of Entropic Chaos
In: Student Theses 2015-Present (2018)
BASE
Show details
16
La relación sujeto-objeto en la concepción kantiana de la ciencia ; The subject-object relationship in the Kantian conception of science
Chaves Montero, Alfonso; Gadea, Walter Federico. - : Universidad Politécnica Salesiana de Ecuador, 2018
BASE
Show details
17
How to Insult and Compliment a Testifier
Malcolm, Finlay. - 2018
Abstract: This article has been published in a revised form in Episteme, https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2016.39. This version is free to view and download for private research and study only. Not for re-distribution, re-sale or use in derivative works. © 2016 Cambridge University Press. ; Do we insult or slight a speaker when we reject her testimony? Do we compliment or commend her when we accept her testimony? This paper argues that the answer to both of these questions is yes, but only in some instances, since these respective insults and compliments track the reasons a hearer has for rejecting or accepting testimony. When disbelieving a speaker, a hearer may insult her because she judges the speaker to be either incompetent as a knower or insincere as a teller. By outlining the predominant reasons we have for rejecting testimony, I show how not every instance of rejecting testimony embodies this negative evaluation of the speaker. By contrast, testimonial compliments are fewer in number, and are not constitutive of everyday testimonial exchanges, since speakers who are competent as knowers and sincere as tellers are merely behaving correctly in accordance with the norms of testifying. Nevertheless, deferring to an authority on belief can be complimentary to that speaker if by doing so we judge her to have some mastery in a particular domain. This suggests an asymmetry between rejecting and accepting testimony. Testimonial insults and compliments also have important moral applications, particularly regarding epistemic injustice and therapeutic trust. ; Peer reviewed
Keyword: History and Philosophy of Science
URL: https://www.research.manchester.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/how-to-insult-and-compliment-a-testifier(1cd8dcb7-e8ec-4524-93cf-42721d988265).html
http://hdl.handle.net/2299/19978
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84995393618&partnerID=8YFLogxK
BASE
Hide details
18
AESTHETICS AND THE POWER OF STEAM
In: MESSENGER OF KYIV NATIONAL LINGUISTIC UNIVERSITY. Series Philology; Том 20, № 2 (2017); 43-53 ; ВІСНИК КИЇВСЬКОГО НАЦІОНАЛЬНОГО ЛІНГВІСТИЧНОГО УНІВЕРСИТЕТУ. Серія Філологія; Том 20, № 2 (2017); 43-53 ; 2415-7333 ; 2311-0821 (2018)
BASE
Show details
19
Plan - Kritik - Entwurf
BASE
Show details
20
Toward a Pragmatic Ontology of Scientific Concepts
BASE
Show details

Page: 1 2

Catalogues
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
Bibliographies
9
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
13
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern