| 1 |
Spatialization in working memory is related to literacy and reading direction: Culture “literarily” directs our thoughts
|
|
|
|
In: ISSN: 0010-0277 ; EISSN: 1873-7838 ; Cognition ; https://hal.univ-rennes2.fr/hal-01873300 ; Cognition, Elsevier, 2018, 175, pp.96 - 100. ⟨10.1016/j.cognition.2018.02.013⟩ (2018)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 2 |
Compression in Working Memory and Its Relationship With Fluid Intelligence
|
|
|
|
In: ISSN: 0364-0213 ; EISSN: 1551-6709 ; Cognitive Science ; https://hal.univ-rennes2.fr/hal-01873321 ; Cognitive Science, Wiley, 2018, 42, pp.904 - 922. ⟨10.1111/cogs.12601⟩ (2018)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 3 |
Working memory and phonological deficits in dyslexia ; Mémoire de travail et troubles phonologiques chez le dyslexique
|
|
|
|
In: ISSN: 2101-6739 ; Revue de neuropsychologie, neurosciences cognitives et cliniques ; https://hal.univ-rennes2.fr/hal-02071812 ; Revue de neuropsychologie, neurosciences cognitives et cliniques, John Libbey Eurotext, 2018, 10 (4), pp.269-278 (2018)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 4 |
Hiligaynon – Cebuano Sentence Translator using Recurrent Neural Networks ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 5 |
Hiligaynon – Cebuano Sentence Translator using Recurrent Neural Networks ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 6 |
Atypical Speech Development and Working Memory Recall Ability
|
|
|
|
In: University Honors Theses (2018)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 7 |
Following instructions in a dual-task paradigm: Evidence for a temporary motor store in working memory. ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 8 |
Learning nonwords: the Hebb repetition effect as a model of word learning. ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 9 |
Resisting attraction: Individual differences in executive control are associated with subject-verb agreement errors in production. ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 10 |
Novel Word Learning as a Treatment of Word Processing Disorders in Aphasia ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 11 |
Non-Word Repetition and Vocabulary in Adolescents who are Blind
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 12 |
Specific conditions for a selective deficit in memory for order in children with dyslexia
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 13 |
Learning nonwords: The Hebb repetition effect as a model of word learning
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 15 |
Resisting attraction: Individual differences in executive control are associated with subject-verb agreement errors in production.
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 16 |
Following instructions in a dual-task paradigm: Evidence for a temporary motor store in working memory.
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 17 |
Learning nonwords: the Hebb repetition effect as a model of word learning.
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 18 |
Evaluating the Buffer vs. Embedded Processes Accounts of Verbal Short-term Memory by Using Multivariate Neuroimaging and Brain Stimulation Approaches
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Buffer versus embedded processes accounts of short-term memory (STM) have been under debate for decades. Buffer models propose dedicated storage for maintaining different types of information, where these buffers are separate from long-term memory (LTM) for those kinds of information. In contrast, embedded processes models argue against the existence of buffers, and claim STM consists of the activated portion of LTM. This thesis tested two competing models for verbal STM and obtained evidence from three experiments with novel multivariate neuroimaging and non-invasive brain stimulation approaches. From the perspective of cognitive neuroscience, buffer models predict that storage buffers depend on brain regions different from the LTM regions used to represent permanent knowledge, whereas embedded processes models predict that STM recruits the same neural substrate as LTM. Experiment 1 used functional magnetic resonance imaging with representational similarity analysis (RSA) to examine the correspondence of multi-voxel neural activation patterns with the theoretical representations for both phonological and semantic STM. In the phonological domain, a speech processing region in the left superior temporal gyrus (STG) showed RSA evidence of phonological coding during the encoding period, but not during the delay period. In contrast, the left supramarginal gyrus (SMG) showed RSA evidence of phonological storage during the delay period. In the semantic domain, the triangular part of the left inferior frontal gyrus showed RSA evidence of semantic coding during the encoding period, but not during the delay period. In contrast, some posterior regions such as the left angular gyrus, the left posterior middle temporal gyrus and an anterior region in the left middle frontal gyrus showed RSA evidence of semantic retention during the delay period, with the angular gyrus allowing for decoding of either phonological and semantic STM, depending on the task context. Results of Experiment 1 illustrated that different regions were involved in encoding and maintenance for phonological and semantic STM respectively. Experiment 2, using nonword stimuli, tested distractor interference effects on phonological STM. Although the speech processing region in the left STG showed RSA evidence of phonological storage for these materials during the delay period, such evidence was absent when distractors were presented. However, the proposed buffer region in the left SMG showed RSA evidence of phonological retention even in the presence of distractors during the delay period. Results of Experiment 2 suggested that the buffer region played a more important role in phonological STM in the face of distracting stimuli. Experiment 3 used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to test the necessity of the brain regions implicated in phonological STM from Experiments 1 and 2. An effect of TMS on response time for a STM recognition task was observed when the left SMG was stimulated during the delay period, whereas stimulation at the left STG or an occipital control region had no effect on behavioral performance. Results of Experiment 3 confirmed the causal role of the left SMG in phonological STM. Taken together, converging evidence from three experiments provided greater support for a buffer account than an embedded processes account of verbal STM. General implications for the buffer vs. embedded processes debate, as well as implications for theories of the neural basis of working memory are discussed.
|
|
Keyword:
buffer; embedded processes; fMRI; representational similarity analysis; transcranial magnetic stimulation; verbal short-term memory
|
|
URL: https://hdl.handle.net/1911/107974
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 19 |
Autoconceito e memória operacional de crianças com fissura labiopalatina não-sindrômica ; Self-concept and working memory of children with non-syndromic cleft lip/palate
|
|
Baldin, Mayara dos Santos. - : Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP, 2018. : Universidade de São Paulo, 2018. : Hospital de Reabilitação de Anomalias Craniofaciais, 2018
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 20 |
Computational models for multilingual negation scope detection
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
