DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Hits 1 – 10 of 10

1
Three streams of generative language acquisition research: Introduction
In: Three streams of generative language acquisition research (2019), S. 1-4
Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft
Show details
2
Interpretation of count and mass NPs by L2-learners from generalized classifier L1s
In: Three streams of generative language acquisition research (2019), S. 253-269
Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft
Show details
3
Three streams of generative language acquisition research : selected papers from the 7th meeting of generative approaches to language acquisition - North America, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Rispoli, Matthew (Herausgeber); Ionin, Tania (Herausgeber). - Philadelphia : John Benjamins, 2019
BLLDB
UB Frankfurt Linguistik
Show details
4
Wide scope indefinites in Russian: an experimental investigation
In: Glossa: a journal of general linguistics; Vol 4, No 1 (2019); 4 ; 2397-1835 (2019)
BASE
Show details
5
The Bottleneck Hypothesis updated
Slabakova, Roumyana. - : John Benjamins, 2019
BASE
Show details
6
The roles of linguistic meaning and context in the concept of lying
BASE
Show details
7
L1 influence on English word meaning inference
Wu, Mien-Jen. - 2019
Abstract: L2 English learners are known to use some language cues (e.g. context, phonology, or affixes) to infer the meanings of unknown words. Some prior studies (Bellomo, 2009; Kieffer & Lesaux, 2012; Koda, 2000; Ramirez et al., 2011) have found that learners’ L1 may influence the performance; however, their participants’ L1 and proficiency levels were not carefully controlled, and they mainly used qualitative or classroom-based methods. Therefore, this study compared the word learning ability between high proficiency L2 English learners of L1-Korean (a language with rich derivational morphology) and L1-Chinese (a language with only a small amount of derivational morphology) by using the reaction-time technique. English pseudo-words were used in this study, and learners had to infer the meaning of those words by using the morphological cues (i.e. re-, mis-, -ness, -able, un- and -er) and/or the contextual cues provided. Learners’ accuracy and reaction time were recorded; based on previous research it was predicted that L1-Korean L2-English learners would be faster than L1-Chinese L2-English learners in identifying morphological cues in words because of the existence of rich derivational morphology in Korean. However, the results of this study indicated that Korean participants did not have an advantage over Chinese participants in word learning using morphological cues. ; U of I Only ; Author requested U of Illinois access only (OA after 2yrs) in Vireo ETD system
Keyword: (None)
URL: http://hdl.handle.net/2142/95463
BASE
Hide details
8
Processing of canonical and scrambled word orders in native and non-native Korean
BASE
Show details
9
Interpretation and processing of overt pronouns in Korean, English and L2-acquisition
Kim, Eun Hee. - 2019
BASE
Show details
10
Comprehension of Spanish relative and passive clauses by early bilinguals and second language learners
BASE
Show details

Catalogues
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
Bibliographies
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
7
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern