| 1 |
Bridging phonology, meaning, and written form across time: Introducing a database of Chinese ideophones — CHIDEOD (2019) ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 2 |
Bridging phonology, meaning, and written form across time: Introducing a database of Chinese ideophones — CHIDEOD (2019) ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 3 |
Bridging phonology, meaning, and written form across time: Introducing a database of Chinese ideophones — CHIDEOD ...
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Ideophones have been receiving renewed interest in the last three decades (see e.g. Voeltz & Kilian-Hatz 2001; the Iconicity in Language and Linguistics series). However, linguistic studies have been synchronic in nature for the most part (Dingemanse 2018). We address this diachronic research gap by constructing a database for literary Chinese ideophones (following Mok 2001; Van Hoey 2018) that explores the variables such as:1. the phonology across different stages of Chinese2. the morphology of ideophones (different types of partial and full reduplication),3. sensory domain mappings based on a cross-linguistic implicational hierarchy (cf. theauthor; Dingemanse 2012),4. Chinese characters and their radical support (see below).Through this database it is possible to investigate the two different modalities of phonological form and written form, an analysis licensed by the Chinese model of Meaning//phonology / writing ( xíng-yīn-yì 形-音-義 ‘shape – sound – meaning’, cf. Baxter & Sagart 1998, as opposed ...
|
|
Keyword:
FOS Languages and literature; Linguistics
|
|
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.12651899.v1
https://figshare.com/articles/Bridging_phonology_meaning_and_written_form_across_time_Introducing_a_database_of_Chinese_ideophones_CHIDEOD/12651899/1
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
|
|
