| 1 |
Learning oriented feedback in the development and assessment of interactional competence
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 2 |
How much does test-takers’ listening proficiency matter in oral interview tests?
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 3 |
The impact on candidates of examiner interventions in oral interview tests
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 4 |
Comparing rating modes: analysing live, audio, and video ratings of IELTS Speaking Test performances
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 5 |
Examiner interventions in oral interview tests: what are the listening demands they make upon candidates?
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 6 |
Assessment of candidates' interactional competence using group oral tests
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 8 |
Analysing multi-person discourse in group speaking tests: how do test-taker characteristics, task types and group sizes affect co-constructed discourse in groups?
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 9 |
Effects of pre-task planning on paired oral test performance: a case of beginning EFL learners
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 10 |
Effects of the number of participants on group oral test performance
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 11 |
Exploring the use of video-conferencing technology to deliver the IELTS Speaking Test: Phase 3 technical trial
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 12 |
The IELTS Speaking Test: what can we learn from examiner voices?
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 13 |
Academic speaking: does the construct exist, and if so, how do we test it?
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 15 |
Applying the socio-cognitive framework: gathering validity evidence during the development of a speaking test ; Lessons and Legacy: A Tribute to Professor Cyril J Weir (1950–2018)
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
This chapter describes how Weir’s (2005; further elaborated in Taylor (Ed) 2011) socio-cognitive framework for validating speaking tests guided two a priori validation studies of the speaking component of the Test of English for Academic Purposes (TEAP) in Japan. In this chapter, we particularly reflect upon the academic achievements of Professor Cyril J Weir, in terms of: • the effectiveness and value of the socio-cognitive framework underpinning the development of the TEAP Speaking Test while gathering empirical evidence of the construct underlying a speaking test for the target context • his contribution to developing early career researchers and extending language testing expertise in the TEAP development team. ; This project was funded and supported by Eiken Foundation of Japan. ; policy at https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/open-access-policies/open-access-books/green-open-access-policy-for-books - single chapter may be archived, 6m embargo
|
|
Keyword:
academic speaking; English language assessment; mixed-methods research; Subject Categories::X162 Teaching English as a Foreign Language (TEFL)
|
|
URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10547/624513
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 16 |
Development of empirically driven checklists for learners’ interactional competence
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 17 |
Validating speaking test rating scales through microanalysis of fluency using PRAAT
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 18 |
Interactional Competence measured in group oral tests: how do test-taker characteristics, task types and group sizes affect co-constructed discourse in groups?
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 20 |
Researching metadiscourse markers in candidates’ writing at Cambridge FCE, CAE and CPE levels
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
