| 1 |
Metadiscourse, Cohesion, and Engagement in L2 Written Discourse
|
|
|
|
In: Languages ; Volume 5 ; Issue 2 (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 3 |
第二言語ライティング研究分野における情動研究を検証する ーフォーカシングとTAEアプローチを用いてー ; Emotional Studies of Second Language Writing: Focusing and TAE Methods
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 4 |
Working with What You Know: Examining how L2 Graduate Students Negotiate Writing Knowledge
|
|
|
|
In: Masters Theses (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 5 |
Less is more? The impact of written corrective feedback on corpus-assisted L2 error resolution
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
The past decade has seen a sharp increase in research into L2 learners’ direct use of language corpora (typically known as ‘data-driven learning’, DDL) for error resolution in L2 writing. However, a crucial yet underexplored variable in this process is whether and how the form of written corrective feedback (WCF) provided on L2 writing facilitates effective corpus consultation for L2 error resolution. Focusing on L2 writers at the post-graduate level and using a short private online course for DDL training, we determine the impact of four WCF conditions (varying in their degree of directness) on students’ use of corpora for lexical and grammatical error resolution, and the appropriacy of error revisions made with/without corpora for these error types. The results suggest that ‘less (WCF) is more’ if learners are to make successful error revisions via corpus consultation, with more direct WCF conditions often resulting in students revising errors without consulting a corpus. However, less direct WCF conditions sometimes resulted in inappropriate revisions, as learners required additional information as to the nature and location of the specific error. Differences were also found in the effectiveness of corpus consultation for grammatical and lexical error types, with WCF a confounding factor. These results suggest that if corpora are to be used for L2 error resolution, teachers need to carefully consider whether their WCF allows for meaningful engagement with corpora to occur, and whether corpus consultation is suitable or desirable for resolving all error types.
|
|
Keyword:
1203 Language and Linguistics; 3304 Education; 3310 Linguistics and Language; Data-driven learning; L2 error resolution; L2 writing; Written corrective feedback
|
|
URL: https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:30df823
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 6 |
The impact of mediation on technology-supported individual and collaborative writing
|
|
Stell, Annita. - : The University of Queensland, School of Languages and Cultures, 2020
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 7 |
Gender-preferential language use in L1 and L2 argumentative essays? Evidence against lists of ‘gendered’ language features
|
|
|
|
In: Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, Vol 10, Iss 1, Pp 226-241 (2020) (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 8 |
The effects of L1 use and dialogic instruction on EFL writing
|
|
|
|
In: Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, Vol 6, Iss 1, Pp 1-21 (2020) (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 9 |
A phraseological examination of research articles in the field of environment using key phrase frame
|
|
|
|
In: Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, Vol 6, Iss 1, Pp 81-100 (2020) (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
