21 |
An investigation into programme level approaches to feedback: Influences on students' learning and feedback literacy
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
22 |
LitCrit: exploring intentions as a basis for automated feedback on Related Work. ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
23 |
Relation between acoustic and articulatory dimensions of speech sounds: Data and R code ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
24 |
Relation between acoustic and articulatory dimensions of speech sounds: Data and R code ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
25 |
A Simple 3-Parameter Model for Examining Adaptation in Speech and Voice Production ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
26 |
Understanding Graduate Writers’ Interaction with and Impact of the Research Writing Tutor during Revision
|
|
|
|
In: Center for Communication Excellence Publications (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
27 |
Examining the role of feedback on agricultural communications students’ writing self-efficacy and self-determined motivation
|
|
|
|
In: Graduate Theses and Dissertations (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
28 |
Solid (Loud) Matter : Voice and Acoustic Feedback in Performance ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
29 |
Potential pitfalls of interpreting data from English-French tandem conversations ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
30 |
Potential pitfalls of interpreting data from English-French tandem conversations ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
31 |
Why Didn’t You Tell Me That Before? Engaging Students in Feedback within UK Higher Education
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
32 |
Learning from and Engaging with Assessment and Feedback (LEAF): Growing Practice
|
|
|
|
In: Irish Journal of Academic Practice (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
33 |
Interpreting the value of feedback: Older adult voices in nursing education
|
|
|
|
In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
34 |
An Intervention to Improve the Evaluation of Clerkship Students
|
|
|
|
In: Marshall Journal of Medicine (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
35 |
Supporting Emergent Bilingual Professional Development through Supervisor Feedback
|
|
|
|
In: Journal of Educational Supervision (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
36 |
"It's Not Like He Was Being a Robot:" Student Perceptions of Video-Based Writing Feedback in Online Graduate Coursework
|
|
|
|
In: International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
38 |
The Formative Potential of Standards-Based Grades and Report Cards
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Following the initial standards reform movement in U.S. education to establish learning objectives for subject curricula, standards-based grades (SBGs) and standards-based report cards (SBRCs) are theorized to unlock the formative potential in these traditionally summative means. Research on this initiative is in its infancy and my thesis focuses on four areas which remain under- investigated: the degree to which the SBG and SBRC formative rationale holds true; SBG and SBRC impact on student motivation; student perceptions of SBGs and SBRCs; and how the SBRC form impacts student meaning making. My mixed methods case study took place within the middle school of an American international school during the school’s final years with traditional letter grades and its initial years of implementing SBG and SBRC reform. I investigated the meaning students constructed from grades and report cards with the two systems, and how the SBG and SBRC shift impacted student motivation. Results were interpreted using formative assessment theory, the work of Vygotsky and Wertsch, and Self-Determination Theory. Focus group findings revealed that students perceived letter grades uniformly as summative measures, but two contrasting student constructions of SBGs and SBRCs were found: an autonomy supporting formative function through connecting them to criteria rubrics, and a controlling extra step obscuring letter grade standing. It is concluded that schools hoping to maximize the formative potential of SBRCs should avoid a hybrid SBRC. Quantitatively, questionnaire results indicated the SBRC shift had minimal impact on the average motivation of the student population. Integrating focus group results with these quantitative findings, I argue that gains in autonomous motivation within some constructions of SBGs and SBRCs were negated by losses from other constructions. These findings reveal the potential of SBGs and SBRCs to positively impact student learning and motivation, while also raising questions about their successful implementation for all students.
|
|
Keyword:
Assessment; Feedback; Focus Groups; Formative Assessment; Grades; Mixed Methods; Motivation; Report Cards; Self-Determination Theory; Standards-Based Grades; Standards-Based Report Cards; Vygotsky; Wertsch
|
|
URL: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/13699/ http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/13699/1/000632724_Latham_Cameron_Thesis_Examiner_Revisions_.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
39 |
Providing Students with Multimodal Feedback Experiences
|
|
|
|
In: Journal of Curriculum, Teaching, Learning and Leadership in Education (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
40 |
El feedback como herramienta didáctica para el desarrollo de la autonomía en la adquisición de lenguas extranjeras
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|