| 2 |
Comparing the Language of Computer-Mediated versus Face-To-Face Motivational-Type Interviews
|
|
|
|
In: Open Access Theses & Dissertations (2020)
|
|
Abstract:
The current study seeks to determine if computer-mediated and face-to-face motivational-type interviews elicit the same level of affect words and insight words in young adults who are ambivalent about their marijuana use. One-hundred and fifty young adults from a large urban university were randomly assigned to complete a brief motivational-type interview using a standard face-to-face format or instead a novel computer-mediated format. In the computer-mediated format, the interviewer and participant communicated via computer from separate rooms. A two-month follow-up survey assessed each participant's past two-month marijuana use. Pennebaker's Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) program was used to determine if the face-to-face format elicits significantly more positive affect words, negative affect words, and insight words compared to the computer-mediated format. Computer-mediated motivational type interviews (CM-MTIs) elicited more negative affect and positive affect words than face-to-face motivational type interviews (FTF-MTIs), but insight related words were elicited more in the FTF-MTIs. Use of negative affect, positive affect, and insight words did not predict marijuana use at the two-month follow-up. The present findings indicate that the LIWC can be used to compare language usage in computer-mediated and face-to-face motivational type interviews. In addition, the findings also suggest that computer-mediated MTIs may be a feasible method for exploring a participant's ambivalence about their current marijuana use.
|
|
Keyword:
Computer-mediated versus Face-to-Face Communications; Language predictors; LIWC; Marijuana use; Motivational Interviewing; Psychology
|
|
URL: https://scholarworks.utep.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3993&context=open_etd
https://scholarworks.utep.edu/open_etd/2994
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
|
|
