| 2 |
Do people do structural reanalysis when they encounter an implausible sentence? ...
|
|
Yu, Yue. - : Open Science Framework, 2021
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 5 |
The inhibitory effect of a masked word-prime in a lexical decision task: effect of the relative lexical frequency and the previous exposure ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 7 |
Online study of lateralisation of language and literacy processing in monolingual and bilingual adults ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 8 |
Assessing Cognitive Flexibility, Other Executive Functions and Learning in Adolescents ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 9 |
Now you hear me, later you don’t: The Immediacy of Linguistic Computation and the Representation of Speech ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 12 |
Does Speaking Improve Comprehension and Processing of Turkish as a Foreign Language? A Virtual Computer-Assisted Language Learning Study ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 13 |
The Effect of Animacy on Structural Priming: A Replication of Bock, Loebell and Morey (1992) ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 15 |
Does mention order influence perceptions of agency in conjoined phrases? ...
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
In this study, we are interested in how the placement of a word in a particular thematic role frames the interpretation of its meaning. Firstly, we question if mention order signifies grammatical agent. On witnessing an event of dancing in which Tom and Jerry are participating, a speaker might describe this event as Tom and Jerry are dancing, or Jerry and Tom are dancing. We ask how this framing impacts the way in which a listener construes Tom and Jerry in this situation. To do so, we will show participants conjoined symmetrical predicates, e.g. are dancing with each other (“symmetrical” because they are semantically similar with the order or names switched, and the inclusion of “each other” has been suggested to increase the perceived symmetry of the phrase, Gleitman, Gleitman, Miller, & Ostrin, 1996) and we will measure if participants show a tendency to construe the first-mentioned figure as more agentive (the person doing the action to the other person) than the second-mentioned figure, due to its ...
|
|
Keyword:
Agency; Cognitive Psychology; FOS Languages and literature; FOS Psychology; Linguistics; Mention order; Psycholinguistics; Psycholinguistics and Neurolinguistics; Psychology; Social and Behavioral Sciences; Syntax
|
|
URL: https://osf.io/zp5d4/
https://dx.doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/zp5d4
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 16 |
ONLINE PREFFLOOK Mutual-exclusivity inferences in 12-15-month-old infants - an online replication of Pomiechowska, Brody, Csibra, & Gliga (under review) ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 17 |
Discourse- and prominence-driven argument interpretation: the influence of discourse coherence and animacy on the neurophysiological correlates of grammatical function assignment in Swedish ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 20 |
Cumulative vs. distractor-induced semantic interference in participants with lesions in the language network ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
