DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Hits 1 – 16 of 16

1
Methods for developing literacy in professional and academic contexts: Using protocol-assisted modeling
In: Academic Literacy Development: Perspectives on Multilingual Scholars’ Approaches to Writing ; https://hal.uca.fr/hal-03473195 ; Laura-Mihaela Muresan; Concepión Orna-Montesinos. Academic Literacy Development: Perspectives on Multilingual Scholars’ Approaches to Writing, Palgrave Macmillan, pp.81-100, 2021, ⟨10.1007/978-3-030-62877-2⟩ (2021)
BASE
Show details
2
Developing Language Learners’ Use of Appraisal for Argumentative Writing: A Systemic Functional Linguistics Approach ...
Abuhasan, Wlla. - : Université d'Ottawa / University of Ottawa, 2021
BASE
Show details
3
TESOL Applications of the Regressive Imagery Dictionary: An Exploratory Analysis of Word Frequency, Text-Type, and Narrative Production ...
Stockton, Richard. - : Open Science Framework, 2021
BASE
Show details
4
TESOL Applications of the Regressive Imagery Dictionary: An Exploratory Analysis of Word Frequency, Text-Type, and Narrative Production ...
Stockton, Richard. - : Open Science Framework, 2021
BASE
Show details
5
Source-Based Argumentation as a Form of Sustainable Academic Skill: An Exploratory Study Comparing Secondary School Students’ L1 and L2 Writing
In: Sustainability ; Volume 13 ; Issue 22 (2021)
BASE
Show details
6
Implementing Feminist Language Pedagogy: Development of Students’ Critical Consciousness and L2 Writing
In: Education Sciences ; Volume 11 ; Issue 8 (2021)
BASE
Show details
7
Collaborative Multimodal Writing via Google Docs: Perceptions of French FL Learners
In: Languages ; Volume 6 ; Issue 3 (2021)
BASE
Show details
8
L2 writers’ perspectives on face-to-face and anonymous peer review: Voices from China ; Percepciones de los escritores de L2 sobre revisión por pares de manera cara a cara y anónima: Datos de China
Kim, Sugene; Lan, Yizhou. - : Universidad de Granada, 2021
Abstract: To validate a recent study conducted in the Japanese context that contradicted the previously held view that Asian students are culturally predisposed to be reluctant peer reviewers, this study examined Chinese EFL learners’ experiences with and perspectives on peer review in a writing classroom. Fifty-seven college students were asked to perform peer review in face-to-face and anonymous modes to examine whether anonymising the process encourages them to offer more constructive criticism. Data were collected from a Likert-based survey, interviews, and the instructor’s field notes. Statistical analysis of the survey data only partially supported the findings of the study replicated, indicating Chinese students’ preference for both face-to-face and anonymous review modes. Although most of the participants exhibited resistance to peer review during the initial stage, they began to appreciate the benefits of the activity, particularly the verbal discussion component of the face-to-face mode, while some of them refused to give negative feedback on their peers’ work. Regardless of the peer-review mode, the participants remained overly conscious of their feedback accuracy and continued to seek confirmation and oversight from an authority figure (the teacher) rather than taking initiative. ; Para verificar un reciente estudio realizado en el contexto japonés de EFL que contradice la opinión formulada de que los estudiantes asiáticos, por causas culturales, no están dispuestos a ser críticos por pares, este estudio se concentra en las percepciones de los estudiantes chinos sobre críticas en clases de redacción. Se pidió a 57 estudiantes universitarios que realizaran críticas anónimas y cara a cara para saber si el anonimato los alienta a ofrecer críticas más constructivas. Los datos se recopilaron a partir de una encuesta basada en una escala Likert, entrevistas y notas del instructor. El análisis de la encuesta solo respaldaba parcialmente los hallazgos del estudio rehecho, demostrando la preferencia de los estudiantes chinos hacia las modalidades de críticas cara a cara y anónimas. Si bien la mayoría de los participantes mostraron resistencia a las críticas por pares al comienzo, comenzaron a apreciar los beneficios de ellas, en especial la discusión verbal de la modalidad cara a cara, aunque algunos no quisieron hacer comentarios negativos sobre el trabajo de sus compañeros. Los participantes se mantuvieron muy conscientes de la precisión de su retroalimentación y buscaron la confirmación y supervisión de una autoridad (el profesor), en lugar de tomar iniciativa.
Keyword: Anonimato; Anonymity; Chinese students; Escritura en L2; Estudiantes chinos; L2 writing; Peer feedback; Peer review; Retroalimentación por pares; Revisión por pares
URL: https://doi.org/10.30827/portalin.v0i35.13887
http://hdl.handle.net/10481/66325
BASE
Hide details
9
Technologies for Learning Writing in L1 and L2 for the 21st Century: effects on writing metacognition, self-efficacy and argumentative structuring
BASE
Show details
10
Discovering collocations via data-driven learning in L2 writing
Wu, Yi-ju Ariel. - : University of Hawaii National Foreign Language Resource Center, 2021. : Center for Language & Technology, 2021. : (co-sponsored by Center for Open Educational Resources and Language Learning, University of Texas at Austin), 2021
BASE
Show details
11
Working with Multilingual Student Writers
In: Purdue Writing Lab/Purdue OWL Creative Materials (2021)
BASE
Show details
12
Unveiling oral and writing skills of low-literate learners of L2 Italian: from research to teaching practice
Maffia, Marta. - : EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste, 2021
BASE
Show details
13
Oltre “no buono”. L’espressione di gusti e preferenze nella scrittura in italiano L2 di apprendenti vulnerabili
In: Lingue e Linguaggi; Volume 41 (2021) - Special Issue; 119-135 (2021)
BASE
Show details
14
Critical Language Awareness in the Multilingual Writing Classroom: A Self-Study of Teacher Feedback Practices
In: Doctoral Dissertations (2021)
BASE
Show details
15
L2 writers’ perspectives on face-to-face and anonymous peer review: Voices from China
In: Porta Linguarum: revista internacional de didáctica de las lenguas extranjeras, ISSN 1697-7467, Nº. 35, 2021, pags. 149-164 (2021)
BASE
Show details
16
A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF COLLABORATIVE WRITING IMPLEMENTATION IN K-12 SECOND LANGUAGE CLASSROOMS
In: TEFLIN Journal, Vol 32, Iss 1, Pp 50-71 (2021) (2021)
BASE
Show details

Catalogues
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Bibliographies
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
16
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern