DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Hits 1 – 5 of 5

1
Why Questions Break the Residual V2 Restriction (in Basque and Beyond)
In: Why is 'Why' Unique? Its Syntactic and Semantic Properties ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03181218 ; Gabriela Soare. Why is 'Why' Unique? Its Syntactic and Semantic Properties, De Gruyter Mouton, In press, 9783110675115 (2021)
BASE
Show details
2
On the role of prosody in wh-in-situ: Cross-linguistic comparison and experimental evidence from Basque
In: Syntactic Geolectal Variation: Traditional Approaches, Current Challenges and New Tools ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03507649 ; Ángel J. Gallego, Alba Cerrudo and Francesc Roca. Syntactic Geolectal Variation: Traditional Approaches, Current Challenges and New Tools, 34, John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp.263-294, 2021, Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, ⟨10.1075/ihll.34.09dug⟩ (2021)
BASE
Show details
3
Gravettian hand stencils as sign language formatives
In: ISSN: 0962-8436 ; EISSN: 1471-2970 ; Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03181202 ; Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Royal Society, The, 2021, 376 (1824), ⟨10.1098/rstb.2020.0205⟩ (2021)
Abstract: International audience ; Several Upper Palaeolithic archaeological sites from the Gravettian period display hand stencils with missing fingers. On the basis of the stencils that Leroi-Gourhan identified in the cave of Gargas (France) in the late sixties, we explore the hypothesis that those stencils represent hand signs with deliberate folding of fingers, intentionally projected as a negative figure onto the wall. Through a study of the biomechanics of handshapes, we analyze the articulatory effort required for producing the handshapes under the stencils in the Gargas cave, and show that only handshapes that are articulable in the air can be found among the existing stencils. In other words, handshape configurations that would have required using the cave wall as a support for the fingers are not attested. We argue that the stencils correspond to the type of handshape that one ordinarily finds in sign language phonology. More concretely, we claim that they correspond to signs of an 'alternate' or 'non-primary' sign language, like those still employed by a number of bi-modal (speaking and signing) human groups in hunter-gatherer populations, like the Australian first nations or the Plains Indians. In those groups, signing is used for hunting and for a rich array of ritual purposes, including mourning and traditional story-telling. We discuss further evidence, based on typological generalizations about the phonology of non-primary sign-languages and comparative ethnographic work that points to such a parallelism. This evidence includes the fact that for some of those groups, stencil and petroglyph art has independently been linked to their sign language expressions.
Keyword: [SHS.LANGUE]Humanities and Social Sciences/Linguistics
URL: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03181202/document
https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0205
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03181202
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03181202/file/Etx%26Iru2021.pdf
BASE
Hide details
4
Focus and externalization
In: Phonological Externalization ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03513981 ; Hisao Tokizaki. Phonological Externalization, 6, pp.39-60, 2021 (2021)
BASE
Show details
5
Two demirdachian arguments against the radical externalization thesis
In: Short contributions at the occasion of Hamida Demirdache’s 60th birthday ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03514027 ; Short contributions at the occasion of Hamida Demirdache’s 60th birthday, 2021 (2021)
BASE
Show details

Catalogues
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Bibliographies
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
5
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern