Home
Catalogue search
Refine your search:
Keyword:
aspect (1)
event visibility (1)
iconicity (1)
morpho-semantics (1)
morphology (1)
psycholinguistics (1)
semantics (1)
sign languages (1)
sign linguistics (1)
telicity (1)
Creator / Publisher:
Davidson, Kathryn (1)
Kocab, Annemarie (1)
Sims, Andrea D. (1)
Wagner, Laura (1)
Year:
2019 (1)
Medium:
Online (1)
Type
BLLDB-Access
Search in the Catalogues and Directories
All fields
Title
Creator / Publisher
Keyword
Year
AND
OR
AND NOT
All fields
Title
Creator / Publisher
Keyword
Year
AND
OR
AND NOT
All fields
Title
Creator / Publisher
Keyword
Year
AND
OR
AND NOT
All fields
Title
Creator / Publisher
Keyword
Year
AND
OR
AND NOT
All fields
Title
Creator / Publisher
Keyword
Year
Sort by
creator [A → Z]
'
creator [Z → A]
'
publishing year ↑ (asc)
'
publishing year ↓ (desc)
'
title [A → Z]
'
title [Z → A]
'
Simple Search
Hits 1 – 1 of 1
1
The relationship between verbal form and event structure in sign languages
Davidson, Kathryn
;
Kocab, Annemarie
;
Sims, Andrea D.
;
Wagner, Laura
In: Glossa: a journal of general linguistics; Vol 4, No 1 (2019); 123 ; 2397-1835 (2019)
Abstract:
Whether predicates describe events as inherently bounded (telic) or unbounded (atelic) is usually understood to be an emergent property that depends on several factors; few, if any, spoken languages have dedicated morphology to mark the distinction. It is thus surprising that sign languages have been proposed to have dedicated morphology for telicity, and moreover that it takes a form which iconically reflects the underlying event structure – this is known as the “Event Visibility Hypothesis” (EVH) (Wilbur 2008). The EVH has been extended with claims about its universality in sign languages (Wilbur 2008; Malaia & Wilbur 2012), its gradient nature (Kuhn 2017), and its iconic transparency (Strickland et al. 2015). However, in this paper we argue that the status of this relationship between form and meaning remains an open question due to (a) lack of independent tests for telicity, (b) lack of lexical coverage, (c) lack of demonstration that formal expressions of telicity are morphological in nature, rather than a lexical property, and (d) inability to sufficiently dissociate telicity and perfectivity. We present new data coming from verbs that alternate in both form and meaning in ASL that is in line with the EVH, and conclude that while there is evidence supporting a morphological marker, the proposed form and telicity are not isomorphic in their distribution, significantly limiting the “visibility” of the event structure. We further propose that much of the related iconicity is the result of several independent factors also found in spoken languages, so that sign languages may be more similar to spoken languages than typically implied in this domain.
Keyword:
aspect
;
event visibility
;
iconicity
;
morpho-semantics
;
morphology
;
psycholinguistics
;
semantics
;
sign languages
;
sign linguistics
;
telicity
URL:
https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.924
https://www.glossa-journal.org/jms/article/view/924
BASE
Hide details
Mobile view
All
Catalogues
UB Frankfurt Linguistik
0
IDS Mannheim
0
OLC Linguistik
0
UB Frankfurt Retrokatalog
0
DNB Subject Category Language
0
Institut für Empirische Sprachwissenschaft
0
Leibniz-Centre General Linguistics (ZAS)
0
Bibliographies
BLLDB
0
BDSL
0
IDS Bibliografie zur deutschen Grammatik
0
IDS Bibliografie zur Gesprächsforschung
0
IDS Konnektoren im Deutschen
0
IDS Präpositionen im Deutschen
0
IDS OBELEX meta
0
MPI-SHH Linguistics Collection
0
MPI for Psycholinguistics
0
Linked Open Data catalogues
Annohub
0
Online resources
Link directory
0
Journal directory
0
Database directory
0
Dictionary directory
0
Open access documents
BASE
1
Linguistik-Repository
0
IDS Publikationsserver
0
Online dissertations
0
Language Description Heritage
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik
|
Imprint
|
Privacy Policy
|
Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern