6 |
Summary of the three main, competing hypotheses.
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
H1, the representation-based advantage hypothesis, predicts that bilinguals tested in their second language are more creative, mediated by their semantic networks having properties that are similar to the semantic networks of highly creative people. H2, the representation-based disadvantage hypothesis, predicts the opposite: namely that bilinguals tested in their second language are less creative, mediated by a network structure that is less like the networks of highly creative people. Finally, H0, the null hypothesis, predicts that there is no relationship between bilingualism and creativity.
|
|
Keyword:
bilingual; bilingualism; Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified; Cancer; creativity; Evolutionary Biology; Genetics; knowledge representations; monolingual; research; Science Policy
|
|
URL: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234928.g005
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
|