1 |
CLDF dataset derived from Wichmann et al.'s "ASJP Database" v13 from 2010 ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
CLDF dataset derived from Wichmann et al.'s "ASJP Database" v15 from 2012 ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
CLDF dataset derived from Wichmann et al.'s "ASJP Database" from 2010 ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
CLDF dataset derived from Wichmann et al.'s "ASJP Database" v14 from 2011 ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
CLDF dataset derived from Wichmann et al.'s "ASJP Database" v16 from 2013 ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Automated Dating of the World's Language Families Based on Lexical Similarity
|
|
|
|
In: Current Anthropology (2015)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
Automated Dating of the World's Language Families Based on Lexical Similarity
|
|
|
|
In: Current Anthropology (2015)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
Patterns of alignment in verb agreement
|
|
|
|
In: Bickel, Balthasar; Iemmolo, Giorgio; Zakharko, Taras; Witzlack-Makarevich, Alena (2013). Patterns of alignment in verb agreement. In: Bakker, Dik; Haspelmath, Martin. Languages across boundaries : Studies in memory of Anna Siewierska. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 15-36. (2013)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
Automated Dating of the World’s Language Families Based on Lexical Similarity ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
Automated dating of the world's language families based on lexical similarity
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
Adding typology to lexicostatistics : a combined approach to language classification
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
Spanish meets Guaraní, Otomí and Quichua: a multilingual confrontation ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
THE IMPLEMENTATION OF GRAMMATICAL FUNCTIONS IN FUNCTIONAL DISCOURSE GRAMMAR
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
underlying representation in a more or less across the board fashion, only taking into consideration the language dependent semantic function hierarchy. This approach bypasses a number of constraints on subject assignment that may be gathered from typological data, and observed from the actual behaviour of speakers. In this contribution, we make an attempt to reinterpret FG syntactic functions in the light of the FDG model. Following ideas from Givón (1997), we propose a treatment of Subject assignment on the basis of a combination of semantic and pragmatic factors of the relevant referents and other functional aspects of underlying representations. The assignment rules adhere to the respective hierarchies as discussed in the typological literature. In our proposal, Subject (and Object) assignment are now located in the expression component, more specifically in the dynamic version of the expression rules as proposed in Bakker (2001).
|
|
URL: https://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/id/eprint/27269/ https://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/id/eprint/27269/2/13-Bakker.pdf https://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/id/eprint/27269/1/B%26SSubject._EDITED.doc
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
16 |
Semantic distinctions in person forms : unidirectional or bidirectional change.
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|