| 9 |
My first collection
|
|
Demo User. - : The Language Archive, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, 2022
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 11 |
Online Adult Study 2: Validating Key Manipulation and Materials
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 12 |
Learning in a noisy channel: Combining fast mapping and non-literal inference through the lifespan.
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 13 |
The role of speed of processing in early lexical development
|
|
Julia Egger. - : The Language Archive, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, 2022
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 17 |
Project 1 & 2: InGaze – Gaze-triggered looking-while-listening paradigm and parental speech input measures
|
|
Julia Egger. - : The Language Archive, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, 2022
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 18 |
Why Is Inflectional Morphology Difficult to Borrow?—Distributing and Lexicalizing Plural Allomorphy in Pennsylvania Dutch
|
|
|
|
In: Languages; Volume 7; Issue 2; Pages: 86 (2022)
|
|
Abstract:
In this article we examine the allomorphic variation found in Pennsylvania Dutch plurality. In spite of over 250 years of variable contact with English, Pennsylvania Dutch plural allomorphy has remained largely distinct from English, except for a number of loan words and borrowings from English. Adopting a One Feature-One Head (OFOH) Architecture that interprets licit syntactic objects as spans, we argue that plurality is distributed across different root-types, resulting in stored lexical-trees (L-spans) in the bilingual mental lexicon. We expand the traditional feature inventory to be ‘mixed,’ consisting of both semantically-grounded features as well as ‘pure’ morphological features. A key claim of our analysis is that the s-exponent in Pennsylvania Dutch shares a syntactic representation for native and English-origin roots, although it is distinct from a ‘monolingual’ English representation. Finally, we highlight how our treatment of plurality in Pennsylvania Dutch, and allomorphic variation more generally, makes predictions about the nature of bilingual morphosyntactic representations.
|
|
Keyword:
bilingual mental lexicon; exponency; Pennsylvania Dutch; plurality; syntax-morphology interface
|
|
URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7020086
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 19 |
Are We Indeed So Illuded? Recency and Frequency Illusions in Dutch Prescriptivism
|
|
|
|
In: Languages; Volume 7; Issue 1; Pages: 42 (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 20 |
In Between Description and Prescription: Analysing Metalanguage in Normative Works on Dutch 1550–1650
|
|
|
|
In: Languages; Volume 7; Issue 2; Pages: 89 (2022)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
