| 2 |
Heritage Speakers as Part of the Native Language Continuum ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 3 |
Calgary Working Papers in Linguistics, Volume 30, Fall 2018 ...
|
|
Unkn Unknown. - : Calgary Working Papers in Linguistics, 2018
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 4 |
Degraded acceptability and markedness in syntax, and the stochastic interpretation of optimality theory [Online resource]
|
|
|
|
In: (in:) Gisbert Fanselow, Caroline Féry, Matthias Schlesewsky, Ralf Vogel (Hg.): Gradience in Grammar : generative perspectives. - Oxford [u.a.]: Oxford Univ. Press, 2006, 246-269 [S. 1-29]. (Oxford lingui (2004)
|
|
Linguistik-Repository
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 5 |
多重主格構文の派生と解釈
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
海上保安大学校 ; Japan Coast Guard Academy ; 多重主格(主語)構文について,意味的な成立条件は文献でかなり明らかにされてきたが,統語的な派生に関して,後続の主語が述語と結合し,先行する主語(大主語)の述部となる過程や,項構造が充足された節がさらに上位の述部となれる理由が十分証明されたとは言えない。本稿では大主語の述部となる表現が完全な節ではなく,空所を含む開放文であると主張する。統語的空所に対応する自由変項がλ抽象化されることにより開放文が大主語について叙述する述部となる。空所は統語的には任意の位置に許され,大主語は述語と直接意味関係を持たなくとも,述部となる文の中に空所がある限り(文法的には)再帰的に生じることができる。本稿では派生述部を合成する過程とそれに対応する解釈を明示しながら,文献で提案された多重主格構文の意味的条件が,表現に付与される範疇と解釈に語彙的に指定されると主張する。またこの構文の統語的・意味的特性と主格名詞句の関係節化に関する制限との関係についても派生的観点から考察する。 ; This paper elucidates the formation of layers of predication within a simple sentence, showing the syntactic derivations and semantic interpretations of a wide range of multiple nominative sentences step by step in a parallel manner. It is well known that there is a semantic constraint on the second (and following) subjects in the multiple nominative (subject) construction: they must have some intimate relations with their preceding subjects. To be concrete, the former cannot denote independent individuals but parts of the referents of the latter or individuals standing in certain relationships with them. The second (and following) subjects are functional in that they are lexically specified to take their 'possessors' as argument, and semantically taken to denote relations between individuals. We argue that to derive a multiple nominative sentence, a functional subject first combines with a predicate to yield a clause predicated of a major subject and that the resulting clause comprising a functional subject and a predicate is NOT a full sentence of category S or IP, as argued by many researchers, but an open sentence containing a gap in the possessor position of a functional subject. We show that in multiple nominative sentences, gaps are not confined to the possessor position and can occupy virtually any position in open sentences. Open sentences, as well as usual VPs, can be predicates via lambda abstraction over free variables semantically corresponding to syntactic gaps. We will also give a syntactic and semantic account to the asymmetries in extractability between major subjects and following arguments including non sentence-initial subjects.
|
|
Keyword:
Combinatory Categorial Grammar; layers of predication; multiple nominative construction; relational noun; relative clause formation; 叙述の階層; 多重主格構文; 範疇文法; 関係的名詞; 関係節化
|
|
URL: http://id.nii.ac.jp/1328/00002092/
https://repository.ninjal.ac.jp/?action=repository_uri&item_id=2108
https://repository.ninjal.ac.jp/?action=repository_action_common_download&item_id=2108&item_no=1&attribute_id=54&file_no=1
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
|
|
