1 |
LISTENER PERCEPTIONS OF SOCIOLINGUISTIC VARIABLES: THE CASE OF (ING)
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.ling.ohio-state.edu/~kbck/KCK_diss.pdf (2006)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
1Stanford Semantics Fest
|
|
|
|
In: http://web.stanford.edu/~zwicky/CountingChad.pdf (2001)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
The Principle of Phonology-Free Syntax: Four apparent counter-examples in French
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.stanford.edu/~zwicky/4PPFS.pdf (1997)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
Condition duplication, paradigm homonymy, and transconstructional constraints, Berkeley Linguistics Society 17
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.lel.ed.ac.uk/~gpullum/condition-duplication.pdf (1991)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
SAME BUT DIFFERENT
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Six ways are surveyed in which a single phonological stem can correspond to material with different syntactic distributions, meanings, or uses: synchronically unsystematic identities of stems for different lexemes; three types of systematic grammatical relationships (zero derivation, alternative subcategories, and systematic subsenses); and two types of systematic extragrammatical relationships (extragrammatical conventions of use and nonconventional pure coercion). The impetus for this brief note 1 was the claim, by Charles Fillmore and Paul Kay, in a manuscript draft, 2 that various uses of the same stem in different syntactic contexts result from zero derivations, 'phonologically vacuous constructions of derivational morphology ' (a.k.a. conversions). The relationships in question include those between the a and b examples below. ( 1
|
|
URL: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.167.1656
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
6 |
STYLE OF RESTAURANT MENUS A
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.stanford.edu/class/linguist62n/zwickyzwicky.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|