• Refine your search:
  • 
    Keyword
  • 
    Creator / Publisher:
    
    • Bailey, Todd M. (4)
    • Bott, Lewis (4)
    • Grodner, Daniel (2)
    • Tomlinson, John M. (2)
  • 
    Year
  • 
    Medium:
    
    • Print (2)
    • Online (2)
  • 
    Type
  • 
    BLLDB-Access

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

All fields Title Creator / Publisher Keyword Year AND OR AND NOT All fields Title Creator / Publisher Keyword Year AND OR AND NOT All fields Title Creator / Publisher Keyword Year AND OR AND NOT All fields Title Creator / Publisher Keyword Year AND OR AND NOT All fields Title Creator / Publisher Keyword Year Sort by creator [A → Z]' creator [Z → A]' publishing year ↑ (asc)' publishing year ↓ (desc)' title [A → Z]' title [Z → A]' Simple Search Hits 1 – 4 of 4 1 Possibly all of that and then some: scalar implicatures are understood in two steps Bott, Lewis; Bailey, Todd M.; Tomlinson, John M. In: Journal of memory and language. - Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier 69 (2013) 1, 18-35 BLLDB OLC Linguistik Show details 2 Possibly all of that and then some: scalar implicatures are understood in two steps Tomlinson, John M.; Bailey, Todd M.; Bott, Lewis. - : Elsevier, 2013 BASE Show details 3 Distinguishing speed from accuracy in scalar implicatures Bailey, Todd M.; Grodner, Daniel; Bott, Lewis In: Journal of memory and language. - Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier 66 (2012) 1, 123-142 BLLDB OLC Linguistik Show details 4 Distinguishing speed from accuracy in scalar implicatures Bott, Lewis; Bailey, Todd M.; Grodner, Daniel. - : Elsevier, 2012 Abstract: Scalar implicatures are inferences that arise when a weak expression is used instead of a stronger alternative. For example, when a speaker says, “Some of the children are in the classroom,” she often implies that not all of them are. Recent processing studies of scalar implicatures have argued that generating an implicature carries a cost. In this study we investigated this cost using a sentence verification task similar to that of Bott and Noveck (2004) combined with a response deadline procedure to estimate speed and accuracy independently. Experiment 1 compared implicit upper-bound interpretations (some [but not all]) with lower-bound interpretations (some [and possibly all]). Experiment 2 compared an implicit upper-bound meaning of some with the explicit upper-bound meaning of only some. Experiment 3 compared an implicit lower-bound meaning of some with the explicit lower-bound meaning of at least some. Sentences with implicatures required additional processing time that could not be attributed to retrieval probabilities or factors relating to semantic complexity. Our results provide evidence against several different types of processing models, including verification and nonverification default implicature models and cost-free contextual models. More generally, our data are the first to provide evidence of the costs associated with deriving implicatures per se. Keyword: BF Psychology; P Philology. Linguistics URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2011.09.005 http://orca.cf.ac.uk/28270/ http://orca.cf.ac.uk/28270/1/OA-104.pdf BASE Hide details

Mobile view All Catalogues UB Frankfurt Linguistik 0 IDS Mannheim 0 OLC Linguistik 2 UB Frankfurt Retrokatalog 0 DNB Subject Category Language 0 Institut für Empirische Sprachwissenschaft 0 Leibniz-Centre General Linguistics (ZAS) 0 Bibliographies BLLDB 2 BDSL 0 IDS Bibliografie zur deutschen Grammatik 0 IDS Bibliografie zur Gesprächsforschung 0 IDS Konnektoren im Deutschen 0 IDS Präpositionen im Deutschen 0 IDS OBELEX meta 0 MPI-SHH Linguistics Collection 0 MPI for Psycholinguistics 0 Linked Open Data catalogues Annohub 0 Online resources Link directory 0 Journal directory 0 Database directory 0 Dictionary directory 0 Open access documents BASE 2 Linguistik-Repository 0 IDS Publikationsserver 0 Online dissertations 0 Language Description Heritage 0