DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Hits 1 – 5 of 5

1
Error-based learning and lexical competition in word production: Evidence from multilingual naming
In: ISSN: 1932-6203 ; EISSN: 1932-6203 ; PLoS ONE ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02085672 ; PLoS ONE, Public Library of Science, 2019, 14 (3), pp.e0213765. ⟨10.1371/journal.pone.0213765⟩ (2019)
BASE
Show details
2
Grammatical class modulates the (left) inferior frontal gyrus within 100 milliseconds when syntactic context is predictive
In: ISSN: 2045-2322 ; EISSN: 2045-2322 ; Scientific Reports ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02072504 ; Scientific Reports, Nature Publishing Group, 2019, 9, pp.4830. ⟨10.1038/s41598-019-41376-x⟩ (2019)
BASE
Show details
3
Pupillary Responses to Words That Convey a Sense of Brightness or Darkness
In: ISSN: 0956-7976 ; Psychological Science ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01675300 ; Psychological Science, Association for Psychological Science, 2017, 28 (8), pp.1116-1124. ⟨10.1177/0956797617702699⟩ (2017)
BASE
Show details
4
The cortical dynamics of speaking: present shortcomings and future avenues
In: ISSN: 2327-3798 ; EISSN: 2327-3801 ; Language, Cognition and Neuroscience ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01731326 ; Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, Taylor and Francis, 2016, 31 (4), pp.484-503. ⟨10.1080/23273798.2015.1120878⟩ (2016)
BASE
Show details
5
Embodiment as preparation: Pupillary responses to words that convey a sense of brightness or darkness
In: ISSN: 2167-8359 ; PeerJ ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01460062 ; PeerJ, PeerJ, 2016, non paginé. ⟨10.7287/peerj.preprints.1795v1⟩ (2016)
Abstract: International audience ; A strongly embodied view of language holds that, to understand a word, you must simulate associated sensory input (e.g. simulate perception of brightness to understand 'lamp'), and prepare associated actions (e.g. prepare finger movements to understand 'typing'). To test this, we measured pupillary responses to single words that conveyed a sense of brightness (e.g. 'day') or darkness (e.g. 'night'), or were luminance-neutral (e.g. 'house'). Crucially, we found that the pupil was largest for darkness-conveying words, intermediate for neutral words, and smallest for brightness-conveying words; however, this semantic pupillary response peaked long after participants had already understood and responded to the words. These findings suggest that word comprehension activates sensory representations, and even triggers physiological (pupillary) responses, but that this occurs too late to be a necessary part of the comprehension process itself. Instead, we suggest that pupillary responses to darkness- and brightness-conveying words―and perhaps embodied language in general―may reflect preparation for the immediate future: When you read the word 'lamp', you automatically prepare to look at a lamp, and prepare to read more brightness-related words; this may cause your pupils to constrict in anticipation.
Keyword: [SCCO.LING]Cognitive science/Linguistics; [SCCO.PSYC]Cognitive science/Psychology; [SDV.NEU.SC]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Neurons and Cognition [q-bio.NC]/Cognitive Sciences; [SHS.LANGUE]Humanities and Social Sciences/Linguistics; Embodied cognition; Language comprehension; Pupillary light response; Pupillometry
URL: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01460062/file/peerj-preprints-1795_HAL.pdf
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01460062
https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1795v1
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01460062/document
BASE
Hide details

Catalogues
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Bibliographies
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
5
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern