DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Hits 1 – 6 of 6

1
Pragmatic abilities in bilinguals ; Pragmatic abilities in bilinguals: The case of scalar implicatures
In: ISSN: 1879-9264 ; Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01803048 ; Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, John Benjamins Pub. Co., 2018, ⟨10.1075/lab.17017.dup⟩ (2018)
BASE
Show details
2
Double Negation in a Negative Concord language: An experimental investigation
In: ISSN: 0024-3841 ; Lingua ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01158576 ; Lingua, Elsevier, 2015, 163, pp.75-107. ⟨10.1016/j.lingua.2015.05.012⟩ (2015)
BASE
Show details
3
Action relevance in linguistic context drives word-induced motor activity.
In: ISSN: 1662-5161 ; Frontiers in Human Neuroscience ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01067818 ; Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, Frontiers, 2014, 8, pp.163. ⟨10.3389/fnhum.2014.00163⟩ (2014)
BASE
Show details
4
When and How is Concord preferred? An Experimental approach
In: Travaux du 19ème CIL | 19th ICL papers, Congrès International des Linguistes, Genève 20-27 Juillet 2013, International Congress of Linguists, Geneva 20-27 July 2013 [oral presentation in workshop: 120 Negation and polarity: interfaces and cognition (Pierre LARRIVÉE & Chungmin LEE)] ; 19th International Congress of Linguists (ICL) ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01146044 ; 19th International Congress of Linguists (ICL), Jul 2013, Genève, Switzerland. [34 p.] ; https://www.cil19.org/en/welcome/ (2013)
Abstract: ISBN : 978-2-8399-1580-9. ; International audience ; A longstanding debate asks whether negative polarity (1a.NPI) and negative concord (1b.NC) involve identical or distinct syntactic/semantic operations. Although French (1a&b) and cross-linguistic equivalents share the same first-order-logic interpretation (2a), disagreements remain as to how it obtains for each. Yet only (1b), ambiguously allows a double negative (DN)(2b). Taking the English paraphrase in (2b) to be likewise ambiguous, May (89) proposed that DN encodes a compositional hierarchical scope relation between its negative quantifiers (3a), while NC involves the formation of a resumptive polyadic negative quantifier (3b). Applied to French, this analysis of NC has long ranging consequences. First, NC is clearly distinguished from NPI, as n-words are cast as negative quantifiers. Second, it puts French (1b) and English (2b) under the same theoretical umbrella, questioning the validity of any NC macro-parameter. Third, how (1b) and (2b) should be distinguished arises anew, particularly if French truly favors NC, but English DN. Indeed, although the analysis elegantly allows both readings for (1b)-(2b) without lexical ambiguity, it remains surprisingly vague as to which factors favors NC over DN. Processing costs, intonation, quantifier parallelism, structural complexity, clause boundedness and discourse have all been suggested to influence DN or NC, but in effect, little is known as to how speakers resolve such ambiguities in a single language. The paper explores this question experimentally. Ambiguous sentences like (1b) were paired with two scenes, each representing one reading. Subjects were asked to read them aloud and pick the one that representing its meaning. Sound production and choice time through mouse tracking were recorded. Quantifier parallelism, structural complexity and syntactic position were manipulated to probe their effects on interpretation. The design produces experimental data on the effects of quantificational parallelism, structural complexity, syntactic position, and processing time for NC vs. DN and intonation. On a resumptive quantification analysis of NC, theoretical predictions are as follows: A) parallel simple Pro-Pro structures should produce stronger NC preference than more complex NP-NP ones; non-parallel structures should favor DN. B) DN readings should lead lengthened choice time vs NC C) NC and DN preference should manifest characteristically distinct intonation contours. The paper reports on the first results of this experiment. (1)a. Personne ne fait quoique ce soit. b. Personne ne fait rien. (2)a ¬∃x ∃y do(x,y) ‘No one does anything’. b.¬∃x,¬∃y do(x,y) ‘No one does nothing’. (3)a.(NOx (NOy do(x,y))) b.NO do(x,y)
Keyword: [SDV.NEU.SC]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Neurons and Cognition [q-bio.NC]/Cognitive Sciences; Double Negation; Negative Concord
URL: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01146044
BASE
Hide details
5
Grip force reveals the context sensitivity of language-induced motor activity during "action words" processing: evidence from sentential negation.
In: ISSN: 1932-6203 ; EISSN: 1932-6203 ; PLoS ONE ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00875165 ; PLoS ONE, Public Library of Science, 2012, 7 (12), pp.e50287. ⟨10.1371/journal.pone.0050287⟩ (2012)
BASE
Show details
6
Contextual effects on motor activation during "action word" processing: Grip force study of volition denoting sentences
In: The Neurobiology of Language Conference ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00932603 ; The Neurobiology of Language Conference, Oct 2012, San Sebastian, Spain (2012)
BASE
Show details

Catalogues
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Bibliographies
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
6
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern