DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Hits 1 – 10 of 10

1
Satellite- vs. Verb-Framing Underpredicts Nonverbal Motion Categorization: Insights from a Large Language Sample and Simulations
In: ISSN: 2352-6408 ; EISSN: 2352-6416 ; Cognitive Semantics ; https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01667327 ; Cognitive Semantics, Brill, 2017 (2017)
BASE
Show details
2
Satellite- vs. Verb-Framing Underpredicts Nonverbal Motion Categorization: Insights from a Large Language Sample and Simulations
In: ISSN: 2352-6408 ; EISSN: 2352-6416 ; Cognitive Semantics ; https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01667327 ; Cognitive Semantics, Brill, 2017 (2017)
BASE
Show details
3
Satellite- vs. Verb-Framing Underpredicts Nonverbal Motion Categorization: Insights from a Large Language Sample and Simulations
BASE
Show details
4
Satellite- vs. verb-framing underpredicts nonverbal motion categorization: Insights from a large language sample and simulations
BASE
Show details
5
Satellite- vs. verb-framing underpredicts nonverbal motion categorization : insights from a large language sample and simulations
Abstract: Is motion cognition influenced by the large-scale typological patterns proposed in Talmy’s (2000) two-way distinction between verb-framed (V) and satellite‑framed (S) languages? Previous studies investigating this question have been limited to comparing two or three languages at a time and have come to conflicting results. We present the largest cross-linguistic study on this question to date, drawing on data from nineteen genealogically diverse languages, all investigated in the same behavioral paradigm and using the same stimuli. After controlling for the different dependencies in the data by means of multilevel regression models, we find no evidence that S- vs. V-framing affects nonverbal categorization of motion events. At the same time, statistical simulations suggest that our study and previous work within the same behavioral paradigm suffer from insufficient statistical power. We discuss these findings in the light of the great variability between participants, which suggests flexibility in motion representation. Furthermore, we discuss the importance of accounting for language variability, something which can only be achieved with large cross-linguistic samples
Keyword: BF Psychology; P Philology. Linguistics
URL: https://doi.org/10.1163/23526416-00301002
http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/84268/
http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/84268/9/WRAP-satellite-underpredicts-insights-language-Kita-2017.pdf
BASE
Hide details
6
The macro-event property : the segmentation of causal chains
In: Event representation in language and cognition (Cambridge, 2011), p. 43-67
MPI für Psycholinguistik
Show details
7
Principles of event segmentation in language: The case of motion events
In: Language. - Washington, DC : Linguistic Society of America 83 (2007) 3, 495-532
OLC Linguistik
Show details
8
Principles of event segmentation in language: the case of motion events
In: Language. - Washington, DC : Linguistic Society of America 83 (2007) 3, 495-532
BLLDB
Show details
9
Principles of event segmentation in language: the case of motion events
Bohnemeyer, Jürgen; Enfield, Nicholas J.; Essegbey, James. - : Linguistic Society of America, 2007
BASE
Show details
10
Grammars of space : explorations in cognitive diversity
Wilkins, David (Hrsg.); McGregor, William; Essegbey, James. - Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge University Press, 2006
BLLDB
UB Frankfurt Linguistik
Show details

Catalogues
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
Bibliographies
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
6
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern