4 |
Non-automaticity of use of orthographic knowledge in phoneme evaluation
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
L2 consonant identification in noise : cross-language camparisons
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Dutch listeners' use of suprasegmental cues to English stress
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
Are there really interactive processes in speech perception?
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
Explaining cross-linguistic differences in effects of lexical stress on spoken-word recognition
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
Perceptual compensation for voice assimilation of German fricatives
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
Number agreement in British and American english : disagreeing to agree collectively
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
Asymmetric mapping from phonetic to lexical representations in second-language listening
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
Phonological and conceptual activation in speech comprehension
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
18 |
Lexically-guided retuning of letter perception
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Participants made visual lexical decisions to upper-case words and nonwords, and then categorized an ambiguous N–H letter continuum. The lexical decision phase included different exposure conditions: Some participants saw an ambiguous letter “?”, midway between N and H, in N-biased lexical contexts (e.g., REIG?), plus words with unambiguous H (e.g., WEIGH); others saw the reverse (e.g., WEIG?, REIGN). The first group categorized more of the test continuum as N than did the second group. Control groups, who saw “?” in nonword contexts (e.g., SMIG?), plus either of the unambiguous word sets (e.g., WEIGH or REIGN), showed no such subsequent effects. Perceptual learning about ambiguous letters therefore appears to be based on lexical knowledge, just as in an analogous speech experiment (Norris, McQueen, & Cutler, 2003) which showed similar lexical influence in learning about ambiguous phonemes. We argue that lexically guided learning is an efficient general strategy available for exploitation by different specific perceptual tasks.
|
|
Keyword:
200499 - Linguistics not elsewhere classified; cognition; learning; letters; lexical access; perception; speech
|
|
URL: http://handle.uws.edu.au:8081/1959.7/34590 https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210600739494
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
19 |
Formant transitions in fricative identification : the role of native fricative inventory
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
20 |
Frequency and form as determinants of functor sensitivity in English-acquiring infants
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|