• Refine your search:
  • 
    Keyword:
    
    • scalar implicatures (2)
    • Constructivist (1)
    • bare plurals (1)
    • child language acquisition (1)
    • child language acquistion (1)
    • language acquisition (1)
    • non-nominative subject (1)
    • plurality (1)
    • plurality inferences (1)
    • pragmatics (1)
    •   more
  • 
    Creator / Publisher:
    
    • Bill, Cory (3)
    • Macquarie University. Department of Linguistics (3)
    • Crain, Stephen (2)
    • Macquarie University. Department of Cognitive Science (2)
    • Romoli, Jacopo (2)
    • Schwarz, Florian (1)
    • Tieu, Lyn (1)
  • 
    Year
  • 
    Medium:
    
    • Online (3)
  • 
    Type
  • 
    BLLDB-Access

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

All fields Title Creator / Publisher Keyword Year AND OR AND NOT All fields Title Creator / Publisher Keyword Year AND OR AND NOT All fields Title Creator / Publisher Keyword Year AND OR AND NOT All fields Title Creator / Publisher Keyword Year AND OR AND NOT All fields Title Creator / Publisher Keyword Year Sort by creator [A → Z]' creator [Z → A]' publishing year ↑ (asc)' publishing year ↓ (desc)' title [A → Z]' title [Z → A]' Simple Search Hits 1 – 3 of 3 1 Scalar implicatures versus presuppositions : the view from acquisition Bill, Cory; Romoli, Jacopo; Schwarz, Florian. - : Springer, 2016 BASE Show details 2 Plurality inferences are scalar implicatures : evidence from acquisition Tieu, Lyn; Bill, Cory; Romoli, Jacopo. - : New York : LSA and CLC, 2014 BASE Show details 3 Children’s pronoun errors : exploring contrasting accounts of why children produce nonnominative subjects Bill, Cory. - : Macquarie Univeristy, 2012 Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to evaluate different explanations of a particular pronoun error which children sometimes produce during language acquisition. This error involves children producing nonnominative pronouns in the subject position of some sentences (e.g. Her is kicking the ball). There has been an explanation of this phenomenon (known as the Agreement/Tense Omission Model, or ATOM) put forward by Schütze & Wexler (1996), based on the Universal Grammar theory. This account has been challenged in a number of papers (Pine, Rowland, Lieven, & Theakston, 2005; Ambridge & Pine, 2006), which found data that was not consistent with the predictions of the ATOM. Pine et al. (2005) went on to suggest that this pronoun error phenomenon could be better explained through a Constructivist or input-based theory. This paper endeavours to evaluate this claim, by investigating whether the language input provided to the children in Pine et al.’s (2005) study is consistent with a number of input-based explanations of these child pronoun errors. The findings of this investigation do not appear to be supportive of the Constructivist-based explanations which are investigated. Therefore, it would appear that this area would benefit from further research and theory development. ; 20 page(s) Keyword: child language acquisition; Constructivist; non-nominative subject; pronoun error; universal grammar URL: http://hdl.handle.net/1959.14/212649 BASE Hide details

Mobile view All Catalogues UB Frankfurt Linguistik 0 IDS Mannheim 0 OLC Linguistik 0 UB Frankfurt Retrokatalog 0 DNB Subject Category Language 0 Institut für Empirische Sprachwissenschaft 0 Leibniz-Centre General Linguistics (ZAS) 0 Bibliographies BLLDB 0 BDSL 0 IDS Bibliografie zur deutschen Grammatik 0 IDS Bibliografie zur Gesprächsforschung 0 IDS Konnektoren im Deutschen 0 IDS Präpositionen im Deutschen 0 IDS OBELEX meta 0 MPI-SHH Linguistics Collection 0 MPI for Psycholinguistics 0 Linked Open Data catalogues Annohub 0 Online resources Link directory 0 Journal directory 0 Database directory 0 Dictionary directory 0 Open access documents BASE 3 Linguistik-Repository 0 IDS Publikationsserver 0 Online dissertations 0 Language Description Heritage 0