• Refine your search:
  • 
    Keyword
  • 
    Creator / Publisher:
    
    • Sidhu, David (5)
    • 43rd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society 2021 (2)
    • Vigliocco, Gabriella (2)
  • 
    Year
  • 
    Medium
  • 
    Type:
    
    • Article (5)
  • 
    BLLDB-Access

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

All fields Title Creator / Publisher Keyword Year AND OR AND NOT All fields Title Creator / Publisher Keyword Year AND OR AND NOT All fields Title Creator / Publisher Keyword Year AND OR AND NOT All fields Title Creator / Publisher Keyword Year AND OR AND NOT All fields Title Creator / Publisher Keyword Year Sort by creator [A → Z]' creator [Z → A]' publishing year ↑ (asc)' publishing year ↓ (desc)' title [A → Z]' title [Z → A]' Simple Search Hits 1 – 5 of 5 1 Audiovisual Maluma/Takete Effect ... Sidhu, David. - : Open Science Framework, 2022 BASE Show details 2 Is Iconic Language More Vivid? ... 43rd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society 2021; Sidhu, David; Vigliocco, Gabriella. - : Underline Science Inc., 2021 BASE Show details 3 Is Iconic Language More Vivid? ... 43rd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society 2021; Sidhu, David; Vigliocco, Gabriella. - : Underline Science Inc., 2021 Abstract: Iconicity refers to instances in which the form of language resembles its meaning (Perniss et al., 2010). The most prominent example in spoken language is onomatopoeia (e.g., woosh, which sounds like a gust of wind). Here we tested whether iconicity makes language more vivid by depicting the sensorimotor experiences being referred to. In Experiment 1, 44 participants read ten short passages (five iconic, five non-iconic), and then rated their vividness on several scales. These passages differed on two key words, which were either iconic (e.g., screech) or non-iconic (e.g., yell). We found no evidence that iconic language was more vivid. In Experiment 2, 199 participants each rated one longer passage that was either iconic or non-iconic (differing on eight key words). We found only marginal evidence of iconic language being more vivid, on subscales related to felt vividness. These results suggest that iconicity does not make written language more vivid. ... Keyword: Cognitive Linguistics; Cognitive Science; Semantics; Semiotics URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.48448/tw3t-mg37 https://underline.io/lecture/26904-is-iconic-language-more-vividquestion BASE Hide details 4 Levels of Processing and Iconicity ... Sidhu, David. - : Open Science Framework, 2021 BASE Show details 5 Priming Boubas and Kikis: Searching For a Sound Symbolic Priming Effect ... Sidhu, David. - : Graduate Studies, 2014 BASE Show details

Mobile view All Catalogues UB Frankfurt Linguistik 0 IDS Mannheim 0 OLC Linguistik 0 UB Frankfurt Retrokatalog 0 DNB Subject Category Language 0 Institut für Empirische Sprachwissenschaft 0 Leibniz-Centre General Linguistics (ZAS) 0 Bibliographies BLLDB 0 BDSL 0 IDS Bibliografie zur deutschen Grammatik 0 IDS Bibliografie zur Gesprächsforschung 0 IDS Konnektoren im Deutschen 0 IDS Präpositionen im Deutschen 0 IDS OBELEX meta 0 MPI-SHH Linguistics Collection 0 MPI for Psycholinguistics 0 Linked Open Data catalogues Annohub 0 Online resources Link directory 0 Journal directory 0 Database directory 0 Dictionary directory 0 Open access documents BASE 5 Linguistik-Repository 0 IDS Publikationsserver 0 Online dissertations 0 Language Description Heritage 0