| 1 |
Word reading skill predicts anticipation of upcoming spoken language input: A study of children developing proficiency in reading
|
|
|
|
In: http://pubman.mpdl.mpg.de/pubman/item/escidoc%3A2028234/component/escidoc%3A2058508/Mani_Huettig_JECP_inPress.pdf (2014)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 2 |
2 Problem Setting and General Overview of the FCA Approach to the Automatic Acquistion of Verb Classes. 4
|
|
|
|
In: http://hal.inria.fr/docs/00/85/28/61/PDF/falgar-rev.pdf (2013)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 3 |
Representation of linguistic and domain knowledge for second language learning in virtual worlds
|
|
|
|
In: http://hal.inria.fr/docs/00/76/64/18/PDF/allegro-lrec12-final.pdf (2012)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 4 |
Getting the word out: neural correlates of enthusiastic message propagation
|
|
|
|
In: http://cn.asc.upenn.edu/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/Falk_2012_FrontiersHumNeuro_Neural-correlates-of-enthusiastic-message-propagation.pdf (2012)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 5 |
Efficient in-memory top-k document retrieval
|
|
|
|
In: http://goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au/~e76763/publications/cps12-sigir.pdf (2012)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 6 |
Phonetic matching in japanese
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.culpepper.io/publications/ysc12-osir.pdf (2012)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 7 |
Language independent ranked retrieval with NeWT
|
|
|
|
In: http://goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au/~e76763/publications/cys11-adcs.pdf (2011)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 8 |
Author manuscript, published in "eLexicography in the 21st century (eLex 2009), Louvain-la-Neuve: Belgium (2009)" A method for grouping synonyms
|
|
|
|
In: http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/42/48/97/PDF/eLex_falk_ingrid_revised.pdf (2009)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 9 |
Islands: A Mixed Analysis
|
|
|
|
In: http://lfg09.net/abstracts/lfg09abs_falk.pdf (2009)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 10 |
Knowledge Management (2009)" LINGUISTIC INFORMATION FOR MULTILINGUALITY IN THE SEMBYSEM PROJECT
|
|
|
|
In: http://hal.inria.fr/docs/00/42/36/02/PDF/main.pdf (2009)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 11 |
Corpus effects on the evaluation of automated transliteration systems
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.mt-archive.info/ACL-2007-Karimi-1.pdf (2007)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 12 |
Do We Wanna (or Hafta) Have Empty Categories
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.stanford.edu/group/cslipublications/cslipublications/LFG/12/papers/lfg07falk.pdf (2007)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 13 |
Sample sizes for query probing in uncooperative distributed information retrieval
|
|
|
|
In: http://goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au/~milad/shokouhi-apweb06.pdf (2006)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 14 |
English to Persian transliteration
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.seg.rmit.edu.au/research/download.php?manuscript=254 (2006)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 15 |
Methodology and Tools for Ontological Semantic Acquisition
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.ling.ohio-state.edu/cllt/mclc/paper/methodology_spartz.pdf (2005)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 16 |
Maurice gross’ grammar lexicon and natural language processing
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.loria.fr/~gardent/publis/poznan05.pdf (2005)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 17 |
The English Auxiliary System Revisited *
|
|
|
|
In: http://cslipublications.stanford.edu/LFG/8/lfg03falk.pdf (2003)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 18 |
Constituent Structure and Grammatical Functions in the Hebrew Action Nominal.” in Miriam Butt and Tracy
|
|
|
|
In: http://linguistics.huji.ac.il/IATL/17/Falk.pdf (2001)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 19 |
The Role of Learning
|
|
|
|
In: http://faculty.ksu.edu.sa/hisham/Documents/Medical+Education/English/Dental+Education/91.pdf (1998)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 20 |
Case: Interaction between Syntax and Discourse Grammar
|
|
|
|
In: http://csli-publications.stanford.edu/LFG3/falk.ps (1998)
|
|
Abstract:
This paper is, in the words of the Call for Papers of this conference, "in the spirit of LFG." The claims that I will be making were originally conceived of in a lexically-oriented version of GB. I have not made the effort to see how it would work in the formalism of LFG. However, the ideas are independent of the theoretical framework, and I believe that they are very congenial to the LFG perspective, under which grammatical sentences are ones that meet conditions at distinct types of representations simultaneously. In Case, as with everything else, the goal of a generative theory is to determine what raw materials Universal Grammar provides for individual languages to use. This requires a broad typological perspective; focusing on a narrow class of languages will often fail to provide the proper basis. It is therefore unfortunate that much theorizing about Case is based almost exclusively on nominative-accusative languages, with ergative languages, if considered at all, added on as an afterthought. A theory of Case must be built from the ground up to consider facts in both nominative-accusative and ergative languages. My point of departure is the phenomenon known as split ergativity: the phenomenon under which ergative languages display some patterning that looks nominative-accusative. The phenomenon is pervasive among ergative languages, but its importance has, in my opinion, not been fully appreciated. The phenomenon of split ergativity shows that, contrary to the usual description, the only real difference between nominative-accusative languages and ergative languages is the existence of ergative Case. Both language types have accusative Case. However, accusative and ergative Case do not always surface; under some conditions a form unmarked for Case (traditionally c.
|
|
URL: http://csli-publications.stanford.edu/LFG3/falk.ps
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.43.489
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
|
|
