DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8...25
Hits 61 – 80 of 495

61
Children’s grammars grow more abstract with age – Evidence from an automatic procedure for identifying the productive units of language
In: http://staff.science.uva.nl/~gideon/borbodzui08cogsci-def.pdf (2008)
BASE
Show details
62
Children’s grammars grow more abstract with age - evidence from an automatic procedure for identifying the productive units of language
In: http://staff.science.uva.nl/~rens/cogsci08.pdf (2008)
BASE
Show details
63
Acoustic and perceptual similarities between English and Korean sibilants: implications for second language acquisition
In: http://www2.hawaii.edu/~vanderso/Cheon%26Anderson.pdf (2008)
BASE
Show details
64
Prosodic variation in L2: a case of Germans speaking
In: http://isca-speech.org/archive_open/archive_papers/exling2008/exl8_021.pdf (2008)
BASE
Show details
65
The Effect of Bilingualism on Cognition: Evidence from Early and Late Bilinguals
In: http://sapience.dec.ens.fr/cogmaster/www/doc/MEMOIRES/2008_FISZER.pdf (2008)
BASE
Show details
66
A model-based approach to second-language learning of grammatical constructions
In: http://server-1.optim.cs.cmu.edu/people/Articles/2008 Frishkoff et al.pdf (2008)
BASE
Show details
67
Language as shaped by the brain
In: http://cnl.psych.cornell.edu/pubs/2008-cc-BBS.pdf (2008)
Abstract: Abstract: It is widely assumed that human learning and the structure of human languages are intimately related. This relationship is frequently suggested to derive from a language-specific biological endowment, which encodes universal, but communicatively arbitrary, principles of language structure (a Universal Grammar or UG). How might such a UG have evolved? We argue that UG could not have arisen either by biological adaptation or non-adaptationist genetic processes, resulting in a logical problem of language evolution. Specifically, as the processes of language change are much more rapid than processes of genetic change, language constitutes a “moving target ” both over time and across different human populations, and, hence, cannot provide a stable environment to which language genes could have adapted. We conclude that a biologically determined UG is not evolutionarily viable. Instead, the original motivation for UG – the mesh between learners and languages – arises because language has been shaped to fit the human brain, rather than vice versa. Following Darwin, we view language itself as a complex and interdependent “organism, ” which evolves under selectional pressures from human learning and processing mechanisms. That is, languages themselves are shaped by severe selectional pressure from each generation of language users and learners. This suggests that apparently arbitrary aspects of linguistic structure may result from general learning and processing biases deriving from the structure of thought processes, perceptuo-motor factors, cognitive limitations, and pragmatics.
Keyword: biological adaptation; cultural evolution; grammaticalization; language acquisition; language evolution; linguistic change; natural selection; Universal Grammar
URL: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.379.3136
http://cnl.psych.cornell.edu/pubs/2008-cc-BBS.pdf
BASE
Hide details
68
Principles of generalization for learning sequential structure in language
In: http://langcog.stanford.edu/papers/frank-cogsci08-generalization.pdf (2008)
BASE
Show details
69
PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE
In: http://www.ieeta.pt/~lsl/pubs/2008-ConnectionScience-p277-297.pdf (2008)
BASE
Show details
70
Prior knowledge bootstraps cross-situational learning
In: http://csjarchive.cogsci.rpi.edu/Proceedings/2008/pdfs/p1930.pdf (2008)
BASE
Show details
71
The Politeness Effect in an Intelligent Foreign Language Tutoring System
In: http://people.cs.pitt.edu/~litman/courses/slate/pdf/WangJohnsonITS2008.pdf (2008)
BASE
Show details
72
Computational models in the debate over language learnability
In: http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/34/84/93/PDF/kaplan-oudeyer-bergen.pdf (2008)
BASE
Show details
73
Fine-grained sensitivity . . .
In: http://psych.nyu.edu/vouloumanos/VouloumanosCognition2008.pdf (2008)
BASE
Show details
74
Learning phonetic categories by tracking movements
In: http://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/research/learningphonetics.pdf (2007)
BASE
Show details
75
Watching the brain during meaning acquisition
In: http://cercor.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2006/10/20/cercor.bhl094.full.pdf (2007)
BASE
Show details
76
Differential effects of stimulus variability and learners’ pre-existing pitch perception ability in lexical tone learning by native English speakers
In: http://www.icphs2007.de/conference/Papers/1558/1558.pdf (2007)
BASE
Show details
77
Differential effects of stimulus variability and learners’ pre-existing pitch perception ability in lexical tone learning by native English speakers
In: http://cns.northwestern.edu/pubs/pdfs/ICPhS_Jiyeon.pdf (2007)
BASE
Show details
78
K.: Unsupervised models for morpheme segmentation and morphology learning
In: http://users.ics.aalto.fi/krista/papers/creutz07acmtslp.pdf (2007)
BASE
Show details
79
Watching the brain during meaning acquisition
In: http://brainvitge.org/papers/mestres_cc_2007.pdf (2007)
BASE
Show details
80
A statistical model for nearsynonym choice
In: http://www.site.uottawa.ca/~diana/publications/ns_tslp.pdf (2007)
BASE
Show details

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8...25

Catalogues
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Bibliographies
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
495
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern