| 1 |
On the Semantics of Locatives
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.linguistics.ucla.edu/people/kracht/html/lokal.pdf (2002)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 2 |
“sub7 – Sinn und Bedeutung” 7 th Annual Meeting of the Gesellschaft für Semantik
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.ub.uni-konstanz.de/kops/volltexte/2003/1103/pdf/ap114.pdf (2002)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 3 |
Meaning of Generic Sentences
|
|
|
|
In: http://jos.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/16/3/237.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 4 |
Nothing Compares to You
|
|
|
|
In: http://elanguage.net/journals/salt/article/viewFile/19.9/1868/
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 5 |
Phonological Domains: Universals and Deviations
|
|
|
|
In: https://dgfs.de/jahrestagung/siegen_2007/downloads/ag-abstracts.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 6 |
Comments to “Interpreting Focus ” by
|
|
|
|
In: http://ncs.ruhosting.nl/bart/papers/eckardt.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 7 |
9 AG 8: The role of variation in language evolution
|
|
|
|
In: https://dgfs.de/jahrestagung/siegen_2007/ags/ag-08-_abstract.pdf
|
|
Abstract:
It is a basic assumption of functional linguistics that the language system is the result of adaptation to the pressure of language usage. This has succinctly been expressed by Du Bois ’ (1987) dictum “Languages code best what speakers do most. ” Formal linguists have largely remained skeptical towards the functional approach because of its teleological flavor. Prima facie, there is no causal mechanism linking the cogni-tively founded properties of the language system to the properties of language use. This predicament is reminiscent to the issue of adaptation in biology, and it is well-known that evolutionary theory offers a non-teleological, causal explanation there. In the past ten years or so, various authors (Nowak, Hurford, Kirby, Croft, Haspelmath inter alia) have proposed to apply evolutionary concepts to language. Under this conception, variation is essential to establish the link between language usage and language system. Among extant theories of (cultural) language evolution, there is disagreement though about the precise nature of this link. Some authors (like Haspelmath) propose a quasi-Lamarckian view of language evolution. This means that variation itself is adaptive. There are also arguments for a quasi-Darwinian view
|
|
URL: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.509.4817
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 8 |
Fachbereich Sprachwissenschaft
|
|
|
|
In: http://ling.uni-konstanz.de/pages/publ/PDF/ap104.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 9 |
2006 Meaning Change in Grammaticalization
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.phil-fak.uni-duesseldorf.de/asw/gfs/common/procSuB6/pdf/articles/EckardtSuB6.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 10 |
Fachbereich Sprachwissenschaft
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.ub.uni-konstanz.de/kops/volltexte/2000/478/pdf/478_1.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
