| 1 |
N-gram probability effects in a cloze task.
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.sfs.uni-tuebingen.de/%7Ehbaayen/publications/ShaoulBaayenWestburyML2014.pdf (2014)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 2 |
Sidestepping the combinatorial explosion: Towards a processing model based on discriminative learning
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.sfs.uni-tuebingen.de/%7Ehbaayen/publications/BaayenHendrixLSA2011.pdf (2013)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 3 |
Quantitative social dialectology: explaining linguistic variation geographically and socially
|
|
|
|
In: ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/d8/a3/PLoS_One_2011_Sep_1_6(9)_e23613.tar.gz (2011)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 4 |
A real experiment is a factorial experiment
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.sfs.uni-tuebingen.de/%7Ehbaayen/publications/baayenML2010matching.pdf (2010)
|
|
Abstract:
Most studies addressing lexical processing make use of factorial designs. For many re-searchers in this field of inquiry, a real experiment is a factorial experiment. Methods such as regression and factor analysis would not allow for hypothesis testing and would not contribute substantially to the advancement of scientific knowledge. Their use would be restricted to exploratory studies at best. This paper is an apology coming to the defense of regression designs for experiments including lexical distributional variables as predictors. In studies of the mental lexicon, we often are dealing with two kinds of predictors, to which I will refer as treatments and covariates. Stimulus-onset asynchrony (soa) is an example of a treatment. If we want to study the effect of a long versus a short soa, it makes sense to choose sensible values, say 200 ms versus 50 ms, and to run experiments with these two settings. If the researcher knows that the effect of soa is linear, and that it can be administered independently of the intrinsic properties of the items, then the optimal design testing for an effect of soa is factorial. One would loose power by using a regression design testing for an effect at a sequence of SOA intervals, say 50, 60, 70,., 200 ms. This advantage of sampling at the extremes is well-known (see, e.g., Crawley, 2002, p. 67): the
|
|
URL: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.678.5436
http://www.sfs.uni-tuebingen.de/%7Ehbaayen/publications/baayenML2010matching.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 5 |
The directed compound graph of English An exploration of lexical connectivity and its processing consequences
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.sfs.uni-tuebingen.de/%7Ehbaayen/publications/BaayenLingBerichte2010.pdf (2010)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 6 |
Corpus linguistics and naïve discriminative learning
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.sfs.uni-tuebingen.de/%7Ehbaayen/publications/BaayenBJAL2011.pdf (2010)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 7 |
Reading of polymorphemic Dutch compounds: Towards a multiple route model of lexical processing
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.sfs.uni-tuebingen.de/%7Ehbaayen/publications/kupermanSchreuderBertramBaayenJEP2009.pdf (2009)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 8 |
Capturing Correlational Structure in Russian Paradigms: a Case Study in Logistic Mixed-Effects Modeling
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.sfs.uni-tuebingen.de/%7Ehbaayen/publications/jandaNessetBaayenCLLT2010.pdf (2009)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 9 |
Predicting the dative alternation
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.stanford.edu/~bresnan/CFI04.pdf (2007)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 10 |
Lexical frequency and voice assimilation
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.ualberta.ca/~baayen/publications/ernestusetaljasa.pdf (2006)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 11 |
Predicting the dative alternation
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.sfs.uni-tuebingen.de/%7Ehbaayen/publications/BresnanEtAL.pdf (2005)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 12 |
Predicting the dative alternation
|
|
|
|
In: http://esslli2009.labri.fr/documents/04-BresnanEtAL2007.pdf (2005)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 13 |
Predicting the dative alternation
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.stanford.edu/~bresnan/qs-submit.pdf (2005)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 14 |
Running title:
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.ualberta.ca/~baayen/publications/PluymaekersEtAlJASA.pdf (2005)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 15 |
Morphological family size in a morphologically rich language: The case of Finnish compared with Dutch and Hebrew
|
|
|
|
In: http://www.sfs.uni-tuebingen.de/%7Ehbaayen/publications/MoscosoBertramSchreuderBaayenJEP2004.pdf (2004)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 16 |
corresponding author:
|
|
|
|
In: http://roa.rutgers.edu/files/720-0305/720-BRESNAN-0-0.PDF (2004)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 17 |
Predicting the unpredictable: Interpreting neutralized segments in Dutch. Language 79.5–38
|
|
|
|
In: http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/language/v079/79.1ernestus.pdf (2003)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 18 |
Extracting the lowestfrequency words: Pitfalls and possibilities
|
|
|
|
In: http://pami.uwaterloo.ca/~nwanas/ftp/Lingusitics/weeber00.pdf (2000)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 19 |
Extracting the lowest-frequency words: Pitfalls and possibilities
|
|
|
|
In: http://lhncbc.nlm.nih.gov/lhc/docs/published/2000/pub2000060.pdf (2000)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 20 |
The Effects of Lexical Specialization on
|
|
|
|
In: http://acl.ldc.upenn.edu/J/J96/J96-4001.pdf (1996)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
