DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Page: 1 2 3 4
Hits 1 – 20 of 71

1
Utilising a systematic review-based approach to create a database of individual participant data for meta- and network meta-analyses: The RELEASE database of aphasia after stroke
In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2022)
BASE
Show details
2
Development and diagnostic validation of the Brisbane evidence-based language test
Rohde, Alexia; Doi, Suhail A.; Worrall, Linda. - : Taylor & Francis, 2020
BASE
Show details
3
Inter-rater reliability, intra-rater reliability and internal consistency of the Brisbane Evidence-Based Language Test
Rohde, Alexia; McCracken, Molly; Worrall, Linda. - : Taylor and Francis, 2020
BASE
Show details
4
Stroke health professionals’ management of depression after post-stroke aphasia: a qualitative study
Baker, Caroline; Worrall, Linda; Rose, Miranda. - : Taylor and Francis, 2019
BASE
Show details
5
Family-centered care in aphasia: Assessment of third-party disability in family members with the family aphasia measure of life impact
Grawburg, Meghann; Howe, Tami; Worrall, Linda. - : Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2019
BASE
Show details
6
Tidier descriptions of speech and language therapy interventions for people with aphasia; consensus from the release collaboration
In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2018)
BASE
Show details
7
Exploring participant perspectives of community aphasia group participation: from “I know where I belong now” to “Some people didn’t really fit in”
BASE
Show details
8
Barriers and facilitators to meeting aphasia guideline recommendations: what factors influence speech pathologists' practice?
Shrubsole, Kirstine; Worrall, Linda; Power, Emma. - : Taylor & Francis, 2018
BASE
Show details
9
What really matters to people with aphasia when it comes to group work? A qualitative investigation of factors impacting participation and integration
Lanyon, Lucette; Worrall, Linda; Rose, Miranda. - : John Wiley & Sons, 2018
BASE
Show details
10
"It's not really worth my while": understanding contextual factors contributing to decisions to participate in community aphasia groups
Lanyon, Lucette; Worrall, Linda; Rose, Miranda. - : Taylor and Francis, 2018
BASE
Show details
11
Factors that influence Australian speech-language pathologists’ self-reported uptake of aphasia rehabilitation recommendations from clinical practice guidelines
Young, Laura; Shrubsole, Kirstine; Worrall, Linda. - : Psychology Press, 2018
BASE
Show details
12
Which outcomes are most important to people with aphasia and their families? An international nominal group technique study framed within the ICF
Wallace, Sarah J.; Worrall, Linda; Rose, Tanya. - : Taylor & Francis, 2017
BASE
Show details
13
A systematic review of rehabilitation interventions to prevent and treat depression in post-stroke aphasia
Baker, Caroline; Worrall, Linda; Rose, Miranda. - : Taylor & Francis, 2017
BASE
Show details
14
The aphasia action, success, and knowledge programme: results from an Australian phase I trial of a speech-pathology-led intervention for people with aphasia early post stroke
Ryan, Brooke; Hudson, Kyla; Worrall, Linda. - : Cambridge University Press, 2017
BASE
Show details
15
Using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health to identify outcome domains for a core outcome set for aphasia: a comparison of stakeholder perspectives
Wallace, Sarah J.; Worrall, Linda; Rose, Tanya. - : Taylor & Francis, 2017
BASE
Show details
16
The top ten: best practice recommendations for aphasia
BASE
Show details
17
Reconceptualising engagement: a relational practice with people experiencing communication disability after stroke
Bright, FAS. - : Auckland University of Technology, 2015
Abstract: ‘Engagement’ is a term increasingly used in healthcare and has commonly been conceptualised as a patient behaviour and responsibility. However, an emerging body of research indicates that the practitioner can influence engagement through their ways of relating, communicating and working with the patient. This doctoral research sought to explore the concept of engagement in stroke rehabilitation, and to develop rich, nuanced understandings of how practitioners engage people experiencing communication disability in this context. A conceptual review explored how engagement was conceptualised in the healthcare literature, followed by two empirical qualitative studies utilising a Voice Centre Relational Approach. The first empirical study explored how people conceptualised engagement, by completing interviews with seven people experiencing communication disability and 14 rehabilitation practitioners. The second empirical observational study was a longitudinal exploration of how engagement was enacted in stroke rehabilitation services, observing 28 rehabilitation practitioners as they worked with three people experiencing communication disability. Together, these three studies helped develop in-depth understandings of engagement practices. This research identified engagement to be a process, something facilitated through the practitioner’s way of working, and as a patient state, evident in the patient’s actions. The findings of this doctoral work propose that engagement is a relational practice, an intentional and reflexive way of thinking, working and being on the part of the practitioner. When enacting engagement as a relational practice, practitioners prioritised getting to know the patient and their needs, and used this knowledge to determine how best to work with them. This could see them emphasise relational or technical, disciplinary-based work depending on the patient’ needs and priorities. Relational dialogue, an integrated approach to communication, was embedded throughout their interactions. Engagement as a relational practice involved weaving together relational work and communication, together with technical, disciplinary-based work, and rehabilitation tasks. Practice was surrounded by a relational frame, a philosophy of practice. There was consistency and coherence between how the practitioner thought about engagement and how they enacted it. Engagement appeared co-constructed; each party’s engagement was influenced by their perceptions of the other person’s engagement. Engagement as a relational practice appeared a skilled, sophisticated way of working. In explicating the recognisable elements of engagement practice, detailing communication patterns which appeared important for engagement, and demonstrating the need to consider practitioner (dis)engagement, this research makes significant contributions to knowledge. It challenges dominant understandings of which aspects of rehabilitation work and communication are legitimate and valuable when working to engage people experiencing communication disability in rehabilitation. This has implications for clinical practice, service development, and student education. These findings also serve as a base for on-going research into engagement. Re-conceptualising engagement as a relational practice may support practitioners to reflect on their understandings of engagement, their patient’s engagement, on their ways of working, and perhaps most fundamentally, the frames and philosophies which surround and influence their practice.
Keyword: Aphasia; Communication disability; Engagement; Professional practice; Rehabilitation
URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10292/9754
BASE
Hide details
18
Development and validation of Australian aphasia rehabilitation best practice statements using the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method
Power, Emma; Thomas, Emma; Worrall, Linda. - : BMJ Publishing Group, 2015
BASE
Show details
19
Crosswalk of participation self-report measures for aphasia to the ICF: What content is being measured?
Brandenburg, Caitlin; Worrall, Linda; Rodriguez, Amy. - : Informa Healthcare, 2015
BASE
Show details
20
Structure, processes, and retrospective outcomes from an intensive comprehensive aphasia program
Babbitt, Edna M.; Worrall, Linda; Cherney, Leora R.. - : American Speech - Language - Hearing Association, 2015
BASE
Show details

Page: 1 2 3 4

Catalogues
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Bibliographies
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
71
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern