DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Page: 1 2 3 4
Hits 1 – 20 of 71

1
Utilising a systematic review-based approach to create a database of individual participant data for meta- and network meta-analyses: The RELEASE database of aphasia after stroke
In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2022)
BASE
Show details
2
Development and diagnostic validation of the Brisbane evidence-based language test
Rohde, Alexia; Doi, Suhail A.; Worrall, Linda. - : Taylor & Francis, 2020
BASE
Show details
3
Inter-rater reliability, intra-rater reliability and internal consistency of the Brisbane Evidence-Based Language Test
Rohde, Alexia; McCracken, Molly; Worrall, Linda. - : Taylor and Francis, 2020
BASE
Show details
4
Stroke health professionals’ management of depression after post-stroke aphasia: a qualitative study
Baker, Caroline; Worrall, Linda; Rose, Miranda. - : Taylor and Francis, 2019
BASE
Show details
5
Family-centered care in aphasia: Assessment of third-party disability in family members with the family aphasia measure of life impact
Grawburg, Meghann; Howe, Tami; Worrall, Linda. - : Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2019
BASE
Show details
6
Tidier descriptions of speech and language therapy interventions for people with aphasia; consensus from the release collaboration
In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2018)
BASE
Show details
7
Exploring participant perspectives of community aphasia group participation: from “I know where I belong now” to “Some people didn’t really fit in”
BASE
Show details
8
Barriers and facilitators to meeting aphasia guideline recommendations: what factors influence speech pathologists' practice?
Shrubsole, Kirstine; Worrall, Linda; Power, Emma. - : Taylor & Francis, 2018
BASE
Show details
9
What really matters to people with aphasia when it comes to group work? A qualitative investigation of factors impacting participation and integration
Lanyon, Lucette; Worrall, Linda; Rose, Miranda. - : John Wiley & Sons, 2018
BASE
Show details
10
"It's not really worth my while": understanding contextual factors contributing to decisions to participate in community aphasia groups
Lanyon, Lucette; Worrall, Linda; Rose, Miranda. - : Taylor and Francis, 2018
BASE
Show details
11
Factors that influence Australian speech-language pathologists’ self-reported uptake of aphasia rehabilitation recommendations from clinical practice guidelines
Young, Laura; Shrubsole, Kirstine; Worrall, Linda. - : Psychology Press, 2018
BASE
Show details
12
Which outcomes are most important to people with aphasia and their families? An international nominal group technique study framed within the ICF
Wallace, Sarah J.; Worrall, Linda; Rose, Tanya. - : Taylor & Francis, 2017
BASE
Show details
13
A systematic review of rehabilitation interventions to prevent and treat depression in post-stroke aphasia
Baker, Caroline; Worrall, Linda; Rose, Miranda. - : Taylor & Francis, 2017
BASE
Show details
14
The aphasia action, success, and knowledge programme: results from an Australian phase I trial of a speech-pathology-led intervention for people with aphasia early post stroke
Ryan, Brooke; Hudson, Kyla; Worrall, Linda. - : Cambridge University Press, 2017
BASE
Show details
15
Using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health to identify outcome domains for a core outcome set for aphasia: a comparison of stakeholder perspectives
Abstract: This study synthesised the findings of three separate consensus processes exploring the perspectives of key stakeholder groups about important aphasia treatment outcomes. This process was conducted to generate recommendations for outcome domains to be included in a core outcome set for aphasia treatment trials.International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health codes were examined to identify where the groups of: (1) people with aphasia, (2) family members, (3) aphasia researchers, and (4) aphasia clinicians/managers, demonstrated congruence in their perspectives regarding important treatment outcomes. Codes were contextualized using qualitative data.Congruence across three or more stakeholder groups was evident for ICF chapters: Mental functions; Communication; and Services, systems, and policies. Quality of life was explicitly identified by clinicians/managers and researchers, while people with aphasia and their families identified outcomes known to be determinants of quality of life.Core aphasia outcomes include: language, emotional wellbeing, communication, patient-reported satisfaction with treatment and impact of treatment, and quality of life. International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health coding can be used to compare stakeholder perspectives and identify domains for core outcome sets. Pairing coding with qualitative data may ensure important nuances of meaning are retained. Implications for rehabilitation The outcomes measured in treatment research should be relevant to stakeholders and support health care decision making. Core outcome sets (agreed, minimum set of outcomes, and outcome measures) are increasingly being used to ensure the relevancy and consistency of the outcomes measured in treatment studies. Important aphasia treatment outcomes span all components of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health. Stakeholders demonstrated congruence in the identification of important outcomes which related Mental functions; Communication; Services, systems, and policies; and Quality of life. A core outcome set for aphasia treatment research should include measures relating to: language, emotional wellbeing, communication, patient-reported satisfaction with treatment and impact of treatment, and quality of life. Coding using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health, presents a novel methodology for the comparison of stakeholder perspectives to inform recommendations for outcome constructs to be included in a core outcome set. Coding can be paired with qualitative data to ensure nuances of meaning are retained.
Keyword: 2742 Rehabilitation; Aphasia; caregiver; Core outcome set; family; ICF; patient involvement
URL: https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:696650
BASE
Hide details
16
The top ten: best practice recommendations for aphasia
BASE
Show details
17
Reconceptualising engagement: a relational practice with people experiencing communication disability after stroke
Bright, FAS. - : Auckland University of Technology, 2015
BASE
Show details
18
Development and validation of Australian aphasia rehabilitation best practice statements using the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method
Power, Emma; Thomas, Emma; Worrall, Linda. - : BMJ Publishing Group, 2015
BASE
Show details
19
Crosswalk of participation self-report measures for aphasia to the ICF: What content is being measured?
Brandenburg, Caitlin; Worrall, Linda; Rodriguez, Amy. - : Informa Healthcare, 2015
BASE
Show details
20
Structure, processes, and retrospective outcomes from an intensive comprehensive aphasia program
Babbitt, Edna M.; Worrall, Linda; Cherney, Leora R.. - : American Speech - Language - Hearing Association, 2015
BASE
Show details

Page: 1 2 3 4

Catalogues
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Bibliographies
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
71
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern