DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Hits 1 – 19 of 19

1
Neurophysiology of non-native sound discrimination: Evidence from German vowels and consonants in successive French–German bilinguals using an MMN oddball paradigm
In: ISSN: 1366-7289 ; EISSN: 1469-1841 ; Bilingualism: Language and Cognition ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03321725 ; Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2021, pp.1-11. ⟨10.1017/S1366728921000468⟩ (2021)
BASE
Show details
2
Towards Interactive Annotation for Hesitation in Conversational Speech
In: LREC 2020 ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02505333 ; LREC 2020, May 2020, Marseille, France (2020)
BASE
Show details
3
Merci·chh, entendu·chh : variation phonétique ancienne ou émergence d’une proto-particule en voie de stabilisation ?
In: Le Français innovant ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02505343 ; Federica Diémoz, Gaétane Dostie, Pascale Habermann, Florence Lefeuvre. Le Français innovant, 130, pp. 291-308, 2020, Sciences pour la Communication, 978-3-0343-4143-1 (2020)
BASE
Show details
4
German [u] vs [ʊ] : checking automatic labelling using various formant measures
In: Phonetik und Phonologie Tagung 2019 ; https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-02406610 ; Phonetik und Phonologie Tagung 2019, Dec 2019, Düsseldorf, Germany ; https://blogs.phil.hhu.de/pundp2019/ (2019)
BASE
Show details
5
Étude comparée de la fluence verbale dans la lecture en allemand L1 et L2
In: 2e Journées d’études du Réseau d’Acquisition des Langues Secondes (ReAL2) ; https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-02406689 ; 2e Journées d’études du Réseau d’Acquisition des Langues Secondes (ReAL2), Dec 2018, Nantes, France ; http://real.cnrs.fr/je-nantes2018 (2018)
BASE
Show details
6
The Impact of Production Complexity in German L2 by French Native Speakers: Focus on /h/ and Vowel Duration Contrast
In: Phonology in Protolanguage and Interlanguage ; https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01737853 ; Elena Babatsouli; David Ingram. Phonology in Protolanguage and Interlanguage, Equinox, pp.255-285, In press (2018)
BASE
Show details
7
Studying Vowel Variation in French-Algerian Arabic Code-switched Speech
In: Interspeech 2018 ; https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01969143 ; Interspeech 2018, Sep 2018, Hyderabad,, India. ⟨10.21437/interspeech.2018-2381⟩ (2018)
BASE
Show details
8
Quand les voyelles longues et brèves ne tiennent pas en place : la qualité vocalique en allemand L2
In: XXXIIe Journées d’Études sur la Parole ; https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-02130881 ; XXXIIe Journées d’Études sur la Parole, Jun 2018, Aix-en-Provence, France. pp.64-71, ⟨10.21437/JEP.2018-8⟩ (2018)
BASE
Show details
9
Studying Vowel Variation in French-Algerian Arabic Code-switched Speech
In: Interspeech 2018 ; https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-02130906 ; Interspeech 2018, Sep 2018, Hyderabad, India. pp.2753-2757, ⟨10.21437/Interspeech.2018-2381⟩ (2018)
BASE
Show details
10
Impact of production complexity in German L2 by French native speakers: focus on /h/ and vowel duration contrast
In: Phonology in Protolanguage and Interlanguage ; https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01507314 ; Babatsouli E. & Ingram D. Phonology in Protolanguage and Interlanguage, Equinox, 2018 (2018)
BASE
Show details
11
Contact de langues : situations, représentations, réalisations ; : Actes des Rencontres Jeunes Chercheurs 2015 de l'ED 268, Sorbonne Nouvelle-Paris 3
In: https://hal-univ-paris3.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01875475 ; 2016 ; https://hal-univ-paris3.archives-ouvertes.fr/RJC2015 (2016)
BASE
Show details
12
Putting German [ʃ] and [c ̧] in two different boxes: native German vs L2 German of French learners
In: Interspeech 2016 ; https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01398574 ; Interspeech 2016, Sep 2016, San Francisco, United States. ⟨10.21437/Interspeech.2016-457⟩ (2016)
BASE
Show details
13
French Learners Audio Corpus of German Speech (FLACGS)
In: LREC 2016, Tenth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation ; https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01398554 ; LREC 2016, Tenth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, May 2016, Portorož, Slovenia (2016)
BASE
Show details
14
Sur les traces acoustiques de /ʃ/ et /ç/ en allemand L2
In: Journées d'étude sur la Parole (JEP 2016) ; https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01427999 ; Journées d'étude sur la Parole (JEP 2016), Jul 2016, Paris, France (2016)
BASE
Show details
15
Disentangling French tongues in a German classroom
In: New Sounds ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01406327 ; New Sounds, Jun 2016, Aarhus, Denmark (2016)
BASE
Show details
16
L’influence du français comme L1 sur la prononciation de l'allemand
In: 18e Rencontres Jeunes Chercheurs en Sciences du Langage ; https://hal-univ-paris3.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01494331 ; 18e Rencontres Jeunes Chercheurs en Sciences du Langage, ED 268 Paris 3 Jun 2015, Paris France (2015)
BASE
Show details
17
Individual Pronunciation Feedback in French Learners of German by using Spectrograms
In: Workshop on Feedback and Pronunciation Training ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01406318 ; Workshop on Feedback and Pronunciation Training, Nov 2015, Saarbrücken, Germany (2015)
Abstract: International audience ; French and German are two languages that differ on segmental and suprasegmental levels. French is classified as a syllable-timed-language with a phrase final accent. German on the other hand is classified as a stress-timed-language with word stress on polysyllabic words.French learners have specific difficulties with the pronunciation and prosody of German like the correct realization of German phonemes, applying the rules of word stress as well as reducing unstressed syllables (e.g. Zimmerer, Trouvain 2015; Hirschfeld, Trouvain 2007)Developing phonological metacompetence (Wrembel 2007) through pronunciation training and feedback should help French learners of German to improve their awareness, which should lead to better performances in their German speech.Neri, Cucchiarinia and Strik (2008) emphasize that feedback should be individual and easy to understand by the learner. One of our aims is to link the learners’ matacompetence with possible feedback to allow students to progress even when the pronunciation class comes to an end.Our research questions are:1) whether spectrograms as a visual feedback in a classroom situation can help to improvepronunciation quality better than only auditory input2) whether participants who use spectrograms as an aid to improve their individualpronunciation progress faster and with higher quality than their pairs who don’t usespectrograms individually.The participants are French first year undergraduate students majoring in English and German with an age range between 18 and 21 years. Their competence levels in German vary between A2 and B2 according to the CEFR. Only participants with a mono-cultural background are chosen for the study.Participants are divided into two groups. Both groups get explicit instructions on the segmental and suprasegmental differences between French and German as well as oral exercises in production and perception that are performed in the classroom. In addition, participants of both groups have to record themselves at home. These recordings happen at four different moments across the semester to assess individual pronunciation progress over time.Only one of the two groups get an introduction to PRAAT as well as comparative spectrograms between German native speakers and French learners of German. Participants of this group are free to use PRAAT as an individual feedback at home to analyse their own productions. The individual use is assessed over a questionnaire at the end of the semester. The other learners group will only get comparative audio files.Individual pronunciation quality is defined by segmental and suprasegmental properties of the utterances: consonant realization especially for /h/-onsets, /ç/ and /ŋ/, vowel quality, length of syllables and reductions of unstressed syllables as well as word stress positions.Hirschfeld, U., & Trouvain, J. (2007). Teaching prosody in German as a foreign language. TRENDS IN LINGUISTICS STUDIES AND MONOGRAPHS, 186, 171-187.Neri, A., Cucchiarini, C., & Strik, H. (2008). The effectiveness of computer-based speech corrective feedback for improving segmental quality in L2 Dutch. ReCALL, 20(02), 225-243.Wrembel, M. (2007). Metacompetence-based approach to the teaching of L2 prosody: Practical implications. TRENDS IN LINGUISTICS STUDIES AND MONOGRAPHS, 186, 189-2010.Zimmerer, F., & Trouvain, J. (2015). Productions of/h/in German: French vs. German Speakers. In Sixteenth Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, 1922-1926.
Keyword: [SHS.LANGUE]Humanities and Social Sciences/Linguistics; classroom situation; feedback; L2 German; learners corpora; pronunciation; Second language learning; sound production
URL: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01406318
BASE
Hide details
18
Segmental difficulties in French learners of German
In: International Symposium on Monolingual and Bilingual Speech 2015 ; https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01398545 ; International Symposium on Monolingual and Bilingual Speech 2015, ELENA BABATSOULI; DAVID INGRAM, Sep 2015, Chania, Greece (2015)
BASE
Show details
19
Segmental difficulties in French learners of German
In: International Symposium on Monolingual and Bilingual Speech 2015 ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01287857 ; International Symposium on Monolingual and Bilingual Speech 2015, 2015, Chania, Greece. pp.421--429 (2015)
BASE
Show details

Catalogues
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Bibliographies
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
19
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern