| 1 |
Congressional Oversight of Intelligence: Current Structure and Alternatives
|
|
|
|
In: DTIC (2012)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 2 |
Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance: DOD Can Better Assess and Integrate ISR Capabilities and Oversee Development of Future ISR Requirements
|
|
|
|
In: DTIC (2008)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 4 |
Intelligence Issues for Congress
|
|
|
|
In: DTIC (2003)
|
|
Abstract:
The U.S. Intelligence Community continues to adjust to the post-Cold War environment. Congressional and executive branch initiatives have emphasized enhancing cooperation among the different agencies that comprise the Community by giving greater managerial authority to the Director of Central Intelligence (DCI). Priority continues to be placed on intelligence support to military operations and on involvement in efforts to combat transnational threats, especially international terrorism. Growing concerns about transnational threats are leading to increasingly close cooperation between intelligence and law enforcement agencies. This relationship is complicated, however, by differing roles and missions as well as statutory charters. The September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, for which no specific warning was provided, have led to increased emphasis on human intelligence, statutory changes permitting closer cooperation between law enforcement and intelligence agencies, and to consideration of organizational changes to the Intelligence Community. Intelligence Community leadership and congressional committees have expressed determination to enhance analytical capabilities. A major concern is an imbalance between resources devoted to collection and those allocated to analysis, with collected data much exceeding analytical capabilities. In several regional crisis areas, the role of the U.S. Intelligence Community is especially important. U.S. intelligence has been used in monitoring security arrangements between Israelis and Palestinians, in attempting to enforce U.N. sanctions on Iraq, in monitoring peace agreements in Bosnia, and in providing precise targeting data on Taliban targets in Afghanistan and on Serbian targets during the Kosovo crisis. A particular concern for many in Congress has been the Intelligence Community's assessment of the missile attack capabilities of foreign countries, especially North Korea. ; CRS Issue Brief for Congress.
|
|
Keyword:
*COOPERATION; *COUNTERTERRORISM; *INTELLIGENCE; *INTERAGENCY COOPERATION; *MISSIONS; *ORGANIZATIONAL REALIGNMENT; *UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT; 9/11 INVESTIGATION; Administration and Management; ALLIED FORCE OPERATION; CIA(CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY); CODING; COUNTERINTELLIGENCE; COUNTERNARCOTICS OPERATIONS; DNI(DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE); DRONES; DRUG SMUGGLING; FEDERAL BUDGETS; FOREIGN MISSILE CAPABILITIES; Government and Political Science; GUIDED MISSILES; INDIA; INTELLIGENCE ANALYSIS; INTELLIGENCE COLLECTION; INTERNATIONAL TERRORISM; IRAQ; ISRAELI-PALESTINIAN CONFLICT; ISRAELIS; KOSOVO; LAW ENFORCEMENT; LEGISLATION; Military Intelligence; MILITARY OPERATIONS; MONITORING; NORTH KOREA; NUCLEAR EXPLOSION TESTING; PALESTINIANS; POST-COLD WAR ERA; TARGETING; TRANSNATIONAL THREATS; Unconventional Warfare
|
|
URL: http://www.dtic.mil/docs/citations/ADA474297
http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?&verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADA474297
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 9 |
Paradigm Shift: U.S. Strategic Intelligence in the 1990's
|
|
|
|
In: DTIC AND NTIS (1993)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
