| 1 |
An Approach Using MIP Products for the Development of the Coalition Battle Management Language Standard
|
|
|
|
In: DTIC (2013)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 3 |
KEYNOTE 2 : Rebuilding the Tower of Babel - Better Communication with Standards
|
|
|
|
In: DTIC (2013)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 4 |
Making Semantic Information Work Effectively for Degraded Environments
|
|
|
|
In: DTIC (2013)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 6 |
Applying A Formal Language of Command and Control For Interoperability Between Systems
|
|
|
|
In: DTIC (2008)
|
|
Abstract:
Battle Management Language (BML) is being developed as an open standard that unambiguously specifies Command and Control information, including orders and reports built upon precise representations of tasks. BML is both a methodology and a language specification, based on doctrine and consistent with Coalition standards. Recent work has concentrated on leveraging standard data model semantics (particularly the Joint Consultation, Command and Control Information Exchange Data Model ? JC3IDM) for a Simulation Interoperability Standards Organization (SISO) Coalition BML (C-BML) specification. While current BML work has organized task representations around the Command and Control Information Exchange Data Model and the 5 Ws (WHO, WHAT, WHERE, WHEN and WHY), the grammar is implicit rather than explicit. Development of a formal grammar is necessary for the specification of a complete language. Formalizing BML by defining its grammar follows the conventions determined by the theory of Linguistics. Initially, it must be determined which type of grammar is to be used. The Chomsky hierarchy specifies that grammars can be Type 0 (unrestricted grammars), Type 1 (context-sensitive grammars), Type 2 (context-free grammars) or Type 3 (regular grammars). While humans sometimes use constructions that may best be described by a context-sensitive grammar (type 1), automated processing is best supported by a more constrained one (Type 2 or Type 3). Our analysis indicates that a Type 2 grammar best fits the requirements for a BML. To specify a BML grammar (our implementation is the C2 Lexical Functional Grammar - C2LG), rules are developed to determine how to create valid BML sentences that describe military tasks, requests and reports. ; Presented at the AFCEA-GMU C4I Center Symposium "Critical Issues In C4I" held at George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia Campus, on 20-21 May 2008. The original document contains color images.
|
|
Keyword:
*BML(BATTLE MANAGEMENT LANGUAGE); *COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEMS; *INTEROPERABILITY; *LINGUISTICS; CCSIL(COMMAND AND CONTROL SIMULATION INTERFACE LANGUAGE); Command; Control and Communications Systems; DOCTRINE; GRAMMARS; HIERARCHIES; JC3IEDM(COMMAND AND CONTROL INFORMATION EXCHANGE DATA MODEL); Linguistics; METHODOLOGY; Mfg & Industrial Eng & Control of Product Sys; MODELS; ROBOTICS; SEMANTICS; SYMPOSIA; THEORY
|
|
URL: http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?&verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADA503034
http://www.dtic.mil/docs/citations/ADA503034
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 7 |
United States Air Force (USAF) Semantic Interoperability Capabilities Based Assessment and Technology Roadmap
|
|
|
|
In: DTIC (2007)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 9 |
Toward a Standard Rule Language for Semantic Integration of the DoD Enterprise
|
|
|
|
In: DTIC (2006)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 10 |
Adding Semantic Support to Existing UDDI Infrastructure
|
|
|
|
In: DTIC AND NTIS (2005)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 11 |
Towards a Formal Ontology for Military Coalitions Operations
|
|
|
|
In: DTIC (2005)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 12 |
Safe and Principled Language Interoperation
|
|
|
|
In: DTIC AND NTIS (2005)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 13 |
Type-Directed Continuation Allocation
|
|
|
|
In: DTIC AND NTIS (2005)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 14 |
Information Engineering in Support of Multilateral Joint Operational Interoperability
|
|
|
|
In: DTIC (2005)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 15 |
Integrated DoD/C4ISR Architectures: It's not About the Framework.
|
|
|
|
In: DTIC (2004)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 16 |
Implications of Multilingual Interoperability of Speech Technology for Military Use (Les implications de l'interoperabilite multilingue des technologies vocales pour applications militaires)
|
|
|
|
In: DTIC AND NTIS (2004)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 17 |
Implications of Multilingual Interoperability of Speech Technology for Military Use (Les implications de l'interoperabilite multilingue des technologies vocales pour applications militaires) (CD-ROM)
|
|
In: DTIC (2004)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 18 |
Information Engineering in Support of Multilateral Joint Operational Interoperability
|
|
|
|
In: DTIC (2004)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 19 |
The Benefit of Ontologies for Interoperability of CCIS. (Easy, Quick and Cheap Solutions are Impossible, if Semantics of CCIS are Affected.)
|
|
|
|
In: DTIC (2003)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 20 |
Semantic Interoperability in AD Hoc Wireless Networks
|
|
|
|
In: DTIC AND NTIS (2001)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
