DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Hits 1 – 11 of 11

1
Investigation of the implementation of a communication enhanced environment model on an acute/slow stream rehabilitation and a rehabilitation ward: A before-and-after pilot study
In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2022)
BASE
Show details
2
Treatment integrity and differentiation in the very early rehabilitation in SpEech (VERSE) trial
In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2021)
BASE
Show details
3
An exploration of aphasia therapy dosage in the first six months of stroke recovery
In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2021)
BASE
Show details
4
Behind the therapy door: what is “usual care” aphasia therapy in acute stroke management?
In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2020)
BASE
Show details
5
A randomized control trial of intensive aphasia therapy after acute stroke: The Very Early Rehabilitation for SpEech (VERSE) study
In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2020)
BASE
Show details
6
Treatment fidelity in aphasia randomised controlled trials
In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2019)
BASE
Show details
7
“Ward Talk”: Nurses’ interaction with people with and without Aphasia in the very early period poststroke
In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2016)
BASE
Show details
8
A randomized controlled trial of very early rehabilitation in speech after stroke
In: Research outputs 2014 to 2021 (2016)
Abstract: Rationale: The efficacy of rehabilitation therapy for aphasia caused by stroke is uncertain. Aims and hypothesis: The Very Early Rehabilitation of Speech (VERSE) trial aims to determine if intensive prescribed aphasia therapy (VERSE) is more effective and cost saving than non-prescribed, intensive (usual care-plus) and non-intensive usual care (UC) therapy when started within 15 days of stroke onset and continued daily over four weeks. We hypothesize that aphasia therapy when started very early after stroke and delivered daily could enhance recovery of communication compared with UC. Sample size estimates: A total of 246 participants (82 per arm) will provide 80% power to detect a 4.4% improvement on aphasia quotient between VERSE and UC plus at a significance level of α = 0.05. Setting: Acute-care hospitals and accompanying rehabilitation services throughout Australia, 2014-2017. Design: Three-arm, prospective, randomized, parallel group, open-label, blinded endpoint assessment (PROBE) trial. Participants: Acute stroke in previous 14 days and aphasia diagnosed by aphasia quotient (AQ) of the Western Aphasia Battery (WAB). Randomization: Computer-generated blocked randomization procedure stratified by aphasia severity according to Western Aphasia Battery, to one of three arms. Intervention: All participants receive UC-usual ward-based aphasia therapy. Arm 1: UC-no additional therapy; Arm 2: UC-plus usual ward-based therapy; Arm 3: VERSE therapy-a prescribed and structured aphasia therapy program. Arms 2 and 3 receive a total of 20 additional sessions (45-60 min, provided daily) of aphasia therapy. The additional intervention must be provided before day 50 post stroke. Study outcome measures: The aphasia quotient of Western Aphasia Battery at 12 weeks post stroke. Secondary outcomes include discourse measures, the Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale-39 and the Aphasia Depression Rating Scale at 12 and 26 weeks. Economic evaluation: Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios at 26 weeks will be reported. Discussion: This trial is designed to test whether the intensive and prescribed VERSE intervention is effective in promoting maximum recovery and preventing costly health complications in a vulnerable population of survivors of stroke. It will also provide novel, prospective, aphasia specific cost-effectiveness data to guide future policy development for this population. © 2016 World Stroke Organization.
Keyword: Aphasia; Aphasia therapy; Controlled trial; Intensity; Medical Neurobiology; Randomized; Rehabilitation; Speech Pathology and Audiology; stroke
URL: https://ro.ecu.edu.au/ecuworkspost2013/1933
https://ro.ecu.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2936&context=ecuworkspost2013
BASE
Hide details
9
Monologues and dialogues in aphasia: Some initial comparisons
In: Research outputs 2011 (2011)
BASE
Show details
10
Effects of Topic Familiarity on Discourse in Aphasia
In: Research outputs 2011 (2011)
BASE
Show details
11
Monologues and dialogues in aphasia : some initial comparisons
Armstrong, Elizabeth; Ciccone, Natalie; Godecke, Erin. - : Psychology Press, 2011
BASE
Show details

Catalogues
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Bibliographies
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
11
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern