| 201 |
Invoking Membership Categories Through Marked Person Reference Forms in Parent-Child Interaction
|
|
|
|
In: Working Papers in Applied Linguistics and TESOL, Vol 15, Iss 1, Pp 1-13 (2015) (2015)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 202 |
Chilean Clitic Reduplication: Implications for Morphology and Syntax
|
|
|
|
In: Working Papers in Applied Linguistics and TESOL, Vol 12, Iss 2, Pp 17-37 (2015) (2015)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 203 |
Theirs, Mine, and Ours: On Being a Doctoral Student and a Mother
|
|
|
|
In: Working Papers in Applied Linguistics and TESOL, Vol 9, Iss 1, Pp 1-2 (2015) (2015)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 204 |
L2 Learner-Made Formulaic Expressions and Constructions
|
|
|
|
In: Working Papers in Applied Linguistics and TESOL, Vol 10, Iss 2, Pp 1-18 (2015) (2015)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 205 |
The Selective Fossilization Hypothesis: A Revitalization of the Construct of Markedness in Second Language Acquisition
|
|
|
|
In: Working Papers in Applied Linguistics and TESOL, Vol 9, Iss 2, Pp 48-51 (2015) (2015)
|
|
Abstract:
With the Selective Fossilization Hypothesis (SFH), Han (2009) cites the synergy of first language (L1) markedness and second language (L2) input robustness as a determinant of selective fossilization and, in doing so, returns the construct of markedness to the forefront of second language acquisition (SLA) research and theory. With the SFH, Han offers a principled account of the differential consequences for L2 learning (Han, 2008, p. 6), and its explanatory and predictive qualities hold great promise for the field. Nevertheless, Han’s unique approach to markedness lays open the possibility for misunderstanding, particularly for those who are accustomed to viewing markedness in SLA through the lens of linguistic universals. Moreover, when one considers that markedness has long been a problematic term in linguistics, with “many different approaches defin[ing] markedness in different ways, apply[ing] it to different domains, and integrat[ing] it into different approaches” (Battistella, 1990, p. 5), the possibility for misunderstanding looms even larger. For these reasons, it might be helpful to take a retrospective look at markedness for the purposes of contextualizing the construct and preempting any potential misapprehensions of its role in the SFH.
|
|
Keyword:
Applied linguistics; English language; First language; Fossilization (linguistics); L1; L2; Language acquisition; Markedness (linguistics); P118-118.7; PE1-3729; Second language acquisition; Selective Fossilization Hypothesis (SFH); SLA
|
|
URL: https://doi.org/10.7916/d8-kpg3-az14
https://doaj.org/article/072c945fea03430cbca489e3c578ec8e
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 206 |
Os neologismos de Sagarana e sua tradução para a língua inglesa
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 207 |
Syllabus design suited to the needs of an ESP group of learners
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 208 |
Ensino-aprendizagem de língua inglesa no ensino fundamental: um estudo de crenças
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
