DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Hits 1 – 7 of 7

1
Lexical access in children with hearing loss or language impairments, using the cross-modal picture-word interference paradigm
BASE
Show details
2
The Role of Sign Phonology and Iconicity During Sign Processing: The Case of Deaf Children
Ormel, Ellen; Hermans, Daan; Knoors, Harry. - : Oxford University Press, 2009
BASE
Show details
3
The Role of Sign Phonology and Iconicity During Sign Processing: The Case of Deaf Children
Ormel, Ellen; Hermans, Daan; Knoors, Harry. - : Oxford University Press, 2009
BASE
Show details
4
Assessment of Sign Language Development: The Case of Deaf Children in the Netherlands
Hermans, Daan; Knoors, Harry; Verhoeven, Ludo. - : Oxford University Press, 2009
BASE
Show details
5
Benefits of Sign Language Interpreting and Text Alternatives for Deaf Students' Classroom Learning
Marschark, Marc; Leigh, Greg; Sapere, Patricia. - : Oxford University Press, 2006
BASE
Show details
6
Educational Responses to Varying Objectives of Parents of Deaf Children: A Dutch Perspective
Knoors, Harry. - : Oxford University Press, 2006
BASE
Show details
7
Benefits of Sign Language Interpreting and Text Alternatives for Deaf Students' Classroom Learning
Abstract: Four experiments examined the utility of real-time text in supporting deaf students' learning from lectures in postsecondary (Experiments 1 and 2) and secondary classrooms (Experiments 3 and 4). Experiment 1 compared the effects on learning of sign language interpreting, real-time text (C-Print), and both. Real-time text alone led to significantly higher performance by deaf students than the other two conditions, but performance by deaf students in all conditions was significantly below that of hearing peers who saw lectures without any support services. Experiment 2 compared interpreting and two forms of real-time text, C-Print and Communication Access Real-Time Translation, at immediate testing and after a 1-week delay (with study notes). No significant differences among support services were obtained at either testing. Experiment 3 also failed to reveal significant effects at immediate or delayed testing in a comparison of real-time text, direct (signed) instruction, and both. Experiment 4 found no significant differences between interpreting and interpreting plus real-time text on the learning of either new words or the content of television programs. Alternative accounts of the observed pattern of results are considered, but it is concluded that neither sign language interpreting nor real-time text have any inherent, generalized advantage over the other in supporting deaf students in secondary or postsecondary settings. Providing deaf students with both services simultaneously does not appear to provide any generalized benefit, at least for the kinds of materials utilized here.
Keyword: Article
URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1686598
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16928778
https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enl013
BASE
Hide details

Catalogues
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Bibliographies
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
7
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern