Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9... 995
| 81 |
Raven's progressive matrices (nonverbal IQ)
|
|
Merel Wolf. - : The Language Archive, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, 2020
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 82 |
Pilot experiment 3 - Scoring PPVT
|
|
Merel Wolf. - : The Language Archive, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, 2020
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 85 |
Can the English stand the bottle like the Dutch?
|
|
Monique Flecken. - : The Language Archive, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, 2020
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 87 |
Pilot experiment 2 - raw data
|
|
Merel Wolf. - : The Language Archive, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, 2020
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 89 |
Dutch Author Recognition Test
|
|
Merel Wolf. - : The Language Archive, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, 2020
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 90 |
Experiment 4 - Scoring PPVT
|
|
Merel Wolf. - : The Language Archive, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, 2020
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 91 |
Experiment 1 - word learning data & LME analyse
|
|
Merel Wolf. - : The Language Archive, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, 2020
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 92 |
Experiment 2 - word learning data & LME analyses
|
|
Merel Wolf. - : The Language Archive, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, 2020
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 93 |
Experiment 3 - post hoc power analyses
|
|
Merel Wolf. - : The Language Archive, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, 2020
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 95 |
Experiment 2 - Pilot reduced written exposure duration
|
|
Merel Wolf. - : The Language Archive, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, 2020
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 96 |
Cross-experimental analyses
|
|
Merel Wolf. - : The Language Archive, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, 2020
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 98 |
Pilot experiment 2 - experimental setup
|
|
Merel Wolf. - : The Language Archive, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, 2020
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 100 |
Universals of listening : equivalent prosodic entrainment in tone and non-tone languages
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
In English and Dutch, listeners entrain to prosodic contours to predict where focus will fall in an utterance. Here, we ask whether this strategy is universally available, even in languages with very different phonological systems (e.g., tone versus non-tone languages). In a phoneme detection experiment, we examined whether prosodic entrainment also occurs in Mandarin Chinese, a tone language, where the use of various suprasegmental cues to lexical identity may take precedence over their use in salience. Consistent with the results from Germanic languages, response times were facilitated when preceding intonation predicted high stress on the target-bearing word, and the lexical tone of the target word (i.e., rising versus falling) did not affect the Mandarin listeners' response. Further, the extent to which prosodic entrainment was used to detect the target phoneme was the same in both English and Mandarin listeners. Nevertheless, native Mandarin speakers did not adopt an entrainment strategy when the sentences were presented in English, consistent with the suggestion that L2 listening may be strained by additional functional load from prosodic processing. These findings have implications for how universal and language-specific mechanisms interact in the perception of focus structure in everyday discourse.
|
|
Keyword:
Dutch language; English language; intonation (phonetics); Mandarin dialects; speech perception; versification; XXXXXX - Unknown
|
|
URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104311
http://hdl.handle.net/1959.7/uws:56695
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9... 995 |
|
