Page: 1... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11... 995
122 |
Pilot experiment 1 - data & analyses
|
|
Merel Wolf. - : The Language Archive, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, 2019
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
123 |
Neural sensitivity to changes in naturally produced speech sounds : a comparison of different stimuli presentation paradigms
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
124 |
Non-native vowel perception in a 4IAX task : the effects of acoustic distance
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
125 |
Concreteness and imageability lexicon MEGA.HR-Crossling
|
|
Ljubešić, Nikola. - : Jožef Stefan Institute, 2018. : Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Zagreb, 2018
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
126 |
Dutch: a language of Netherlands
|
|
: SIL International, 2018
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
131 |
The relationship between speech perception and word learning at the initial state of second language acquisition
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
132 |
Acoustic properties predict perception of unfamiliar Dutch vowels by adult Australian English and Peruvian Spanish listeners
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
133 |
Stress effects in vowel perception as a function of language-specific vocabulary patterns
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
134 |
Vind jij dit kunnen?
|
|
|
|
In: ISSN: 0774-2398 ; Over Taal ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01495987 ; Over Taal, 2016, 55 (3), pp.12-13 (2016)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
135 |
Dutch as the language of science and technology in Japan: the Bangosen lexical works
|
|
Groot, Henk de. - : Paris : Société d'Histoire et d'Épistémologie des Sciences du Langage, 2016. : PERSÉE : Université de Lyon, CNRS & ENS de Lyon, 2016
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
136 |
Lexical manipulation as a discovery tool for psycholinguistic research
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
137 |
Can Australian English listeners learn non-native vowels via distributional learning?
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
138 |
Use of language-specific speech cues in highly proficient second-language listening
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Language-specificity in listening to speech occurs at all processing levels and even between structurally close languages (e.g., English, Dutch). Transitional cues to fricative place of articulation are used in English for identifying /f/ (which resembles theta) but not /s/, whereas in Dutch (without theta) they are used for neither. In spoken-word recognition, suprasegmental cues are used in Dutch, but not in English (with more segmental reduction); Dutch L2 listeners even outperform native L1 listeners in detecting origin of differently stressed English syllables (e.g., car- from CARton versus carTOON). Here, longterm residents in Australia with Dutch as L1 but predominantly using English completed each of these tasks. In the phonetic task, with cross-spliced nonsense words, these listeners performed just as Dutch listeners in the Netherlands, showing insensitivity to transitional cues for both /f/ and /s/. In the lexical task, with word fragments (e.g., car-), they however did not behave as L1 Dutch and outperform Australian English listeners, but instead resembled the latter, by ignoring suprasegmental stress cues. A (lexical) listening strategy available in L1 can apparently be abandoned if it delivers little payoff in L2, but acquiring for L2 listening a (phonetic) strategy not used in L1 seems less feasible.
|
|
Keyword:
Australia; Dutch language; English language; listening; second language acquisition; XXXXXX - Unknown
|
|
URL: https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4950402 http://handle.westernsydney.edu.au:8081/1959.7/uws:41001
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
Page: 1... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11... 995
|
|