DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Hits 1 – 19 of 19

1
Investigating Second Language Reading Components:Reading for Different Types of Meaning
In: Working Papers in Applied Linguistics and TESOL, Vol 9, Iss 2, Pp 1-28 (2015) (2015)
BASE
Show details
2
The Role of Metalinguistic Awareness in Multilingual Acquisition
In: Working Papers in Applied Linguistics and TESOL, Vol 13, Iss 2, Pp 57-59 (2015) (2015)
BASE
Show details
3
Classroom-based Language Assessment for Young Language Learners
In: Working Papers in Applied Linguistics and TESOL, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 55-56 (2015) (2015)
BASE
Show details
4
Talmy’s Dichotomous Typology and Japanese Lexicalization Patterns of Motion Events
In: Working Papers in Applied Linguistics and TESOL, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 29-47 (2015) (2015)
BASE
Show details
5
The Use of Technology In-and-outside Second Language Classrooms: How, What, and Why?
In: Working Papers in Applied Linguistics and TESOL, Vol 11, Iss 2, Pp 25-26 (2015) (2015)
BASE
Show details
6
Case Study Research in Applied Linguistics
In: Working Papers in Applied Linguistics and TESOL, Vol 9, Iss 1, Pp 1-5 (2015) (2015)
BASE
Show details
7
Effects of Output and Note-Taking on Noticing and Interlanguage Development
In: Working Papers in Applied Linguistics and TESOL, Vol 10, Iss 2, Pp 19-36 (2015) (2015)
BASE
Show details
8
Practice in a Second Language: Perspectives from Applied Linguistics and Cognitive Psychology
In: Working Papers in Applied Linguistics and TESOL, Vol 8, Iss 2, Pp 1-5 (2015) (2015)
BASE
Show details
9
Technological Growth and L2 Construct Definition: Will Applied Linguistics Keep Pace with Language Users?
In: Working Papers in Applied Linguistics and TESOL, Vol 12, Iss 2, Pp 48-49 (2015) (2015)
BASE
Show details
10
Task Complexity and Linguistic Complexity: An Exploratory Study
In: Working Papers in Applied Linguistics and TESOL, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-28 (2015) (2015)
BASE
Show details
11
Topic Familiarity and Input Enhancement: An Empirical Investigation
In: Working Papers in Applied Linguistics and TESOL, Vol 8, Iss 2, Pp 1-51 (2015) (2015)
BASE
Show details
12
Some Unresolved Issues in an ELT New Media Age: Towards Building an Interlanguage Semantics
In: Working Papers in Applied Linguistics and TESOL, Vol 11, Iss 2, Pp 4-5 (2015) (2015)
BASE
Show details
13
Input, interaction, and corrective feedback in L2 learning
In: Working Papers in Applied Linguistics and TESOL, Vol 13, Iss 1, Pp 49-51 (2015) (2015)
BASE
Show details
14
Written Corrective Feedback: A Review of Studies since Truscott (1996)
In: Working Papers in Applied Linguistics and TESOL, Vol 13, Iss 2, Pp 69-84 (2015) (2015)
Abstract: Linguistic errors are pervasive in second language (L2) students’ writing. Depending on their gravity, the errors may cause a minor degree of irritation to the reader or even lead to total communication breakdown. As such, errors have always been a major concern to both students and teachers, and error correction has also assumed a central position in language teaching. Students generally expect that their errors will be pointed out and dealt with by their teachers. For instance, in a study on students’ attitudes toward corrective feedback (CF) in college-level English writing classes, Leki (1991) surveyed 100 English as a Second Language (ESL) students, asking them such questions as how concerned they were with their written errors, what they thought were the most important features in their writing that the teacher should attend to, and what they looked at when receiving a graded paper from the teacher. The results of the survey indicated that the students believed that good writing should be error-free, and the majority wanted all their written errors to be corrected. For L2 teachers, providing written CF on student writing has long been an essential practice. In fact, “grammar correction is something of an institution” (Truscott, 1996, p. 327) in L2 writing courses. Despite the fact that correcting students’ written errors is a time-consuming ordeal, and the endeavor is “fraught with uncertainty about its long-term effectiveness” (Ferris, 1999, p. 1), most L2 teachers have continued to slave over students’ errors in one form or another. As confirmed by a recent study on practitioners’ perspectives, the majority of teachers believe that students need CF and that written CF is overall an effective pedagogical practice (Evans et al., 2010).
Keyword: Ability testing; Applied linguistics; CF; Corrective feedback; Education; English as a second language; English language; ESL; Feedback; Foreign speakers; Higher education; L2; Language acquisition; P118-118.7; PE1-3729; Second language; Second language acquisition; SLA; Study of language; Teaching language; Writing english language; Written feedback
URL: https://doaj.org/article/694951342d5a431b9bd9b99838700d88
https://doi.org/10.7916/D8F19BBF
BASE
Hide details
15
Knowing Your Reader: Text-External Influences on Textual Features in Résumé Construction
In: Working Papers in Applied Linguistics and TESOL, Vol 8, Iss 2, Pp 1-30 (2015) (2015)
BASE
Show details
16
Strategic Competence and L2 Speaking Assessment
In: Working Papers in Applied Linguistics and TESOL, Vol 14, Iss 1, Pp 13-24 (2015) (2015)
BASE
Show details
17
CMC and Face-to-face Communication in L2 Learning
In: Working Papers in Applied Linguistics and TESOL, Vol 11, Iss 2, Pp 23-24 (2015) (2015)
BASE
Show details
18
Extended Implications of Technology in Second Language Teaching and Learning
In: Working Papers in Applied Linguistics and TESOL, Vol 11, Iss 2, Pp 27-29 (2015) (2015)
BASE
Show details
19
Processing Instruction and Second Language Grammar Acquisition
In: Working Papers in Applied Linguistics and TESOL, Vol 8, Iss 2, Pp 1-33 (2015) (2015)
BASE
Show details

Catalogues
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Bibliographies
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
19
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern