| 21 |
The Investigation of Difference between PPT and CBT Results of EFL Learners in Iran: Computer Familiarity and Test Performance in CBT
|
|
|
|
In: International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences ; 11 ; 66-75 (2017)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 22 |
Diagnostic tests in Czech for pupils with a first language different from the language of schooling ; Diagnosticni testi na Ceskem za ucence, katerih prvi jezik ni enak jeziku solanja
|
|
|
|
In: CEPS Journal 6 (2016) 1, S. 31-48 (2016)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 23 |
Zur Entwicklung eines interaktiven Verfahrens der Sprachstandsermittlung bei mehrsprachig aufwachsenden Kindern. Von der Idee zu ersten Umsetzungsschritten
|
|
|
|
In: Zeitschrift für interkulturellen Fremdsprachenunterricht 21 (2016) 2, S. 127-142 (2016)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 24 |
Comparing C-tests and Yes/No vocabulary size tests as predictors of receptive language skills
|
|
|
|
In: Language testing 33 (2016) 4, S. 555-575 (2016)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 25 |
Correlating English Language Learner CRCT Scores on the Basis of English Language Learner ACCESS Scores
|
|
|
|
In: Doctoral Dissertations and Projects (2016)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 26 |
Inklusion von Roma-Schülerinnen und Schülern: (Wie) Können Sprachtherapie und Sprachheilpädagogik unterstützen?
|
|
|
|
In: Stitzinger, Ulrich [Hrsg.]; Sallat, Stephan [Hrsg.]; Lüdtke, Ulrike [Hrsg.]: Sprache und Inklusion als Chance?! Expertise und Innovation für Kita, Schule und Praxis. Idstein : Schulz-Kirchner Verlag 2016, S. 325-331. - (Sprachheilpädagogik aktuell. Beiträge für Schule, Kindergarten, therapeutische Praxis; 2) (2016)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 27 |
Sprachdiagnostik als Ausgangspunkt für Förderung mehrsprachiger Schülerinnen und Schüler
|
|
|
|
In: Pädagogik leben (2016) 2, S. 10-12 (2016)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 28 |
Working memory in children with learning disabilities in reading versus spelling. Searching for overlapping and specific cognitive factors
|
|
|
|
In: Journal of Learning Disabilities 48 (2015) 6, S. 622-634 (2015)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 29 |
Sprachliche Heterogenität im Musikunterricht ; Teaching as communication. A contingency-based approach
|
|
|
|
In: Niessen, Anne [Hrsg.]; Knigge, Jens [Hrsg.]: Theoretische Rahmung und Theoriebildung in der musikpädagogischen Forschung. Münster ; New York : Waxmann 2015, S. 235-249. - (Musikpädagogische Forschung; 36) (2015)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 30 |
Kompetenz von Lehramtsstudierenden in Deutsch als Zweitsprache. Validierung des GSL-Testinstruments
|
|
|
|
In: Blömeke, Sigrid [Hrsg.]; Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, Olga [Hrsg.]: Kompetenzen von Studierenden. Weinheim u.a. : Beltz Juventa 2015, S. 32-54. - (Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, Beiheft; 61) (2015)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 31 |
Mädchen haben Vorteile im Lesen, Jungen in Mathematik? Geschlechterstereotype auf dem Prüfstand
|
|
|
|
In: Schulverwaltung : Zeitschrift für Schulentwicklung und Schulmanagement. Nordrhein-Westfalen 26 (2015) 11, S. 295-298 (2015)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 32 |
Long-term effects of a parent- based language intervention on language outcomes and working memory for late-talking toddlers
|
|
|
|
In: Journal of Early Intervention 37 (2015) 3, S. 175-189 (2015)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 33 |
Comparing C-tests and Yes/No vocabulary size tests as predictors of receptive language skills
|
|
|
|
In: Language testing (2015), S. 1-21 (2015)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 34 |
Integrative heuristic teaching versus edutainment
|
|
|
|
In: Koncept (Kirov): Scientific and Methodological e-magazine ; 11 (2015)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 35 |
Survival of the Fittest: The Role of Linguistic Modification in Nursing Education
|
|
|
|
In: UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones (2015)
|
|
Abstract:
This project’s long term goal was to improve English-as-a-Second-Language (ESL) nursing student retention. Improving the quality of multiple choice exams is a first crucial step. ESL students find multiple-choice exams to be one of the most challenging aspects of nursing school. One reason for this is the presence of linguistic errors in exam questions. Linguistic errors include: irrelevant question content, poor sentence structure, and culturally biased words or phrases. Non-ESL students are less affected because exams are written in their native language. Linguistic modification, as part of best practices in item writing, removes these types of errors. The U.S. Department of Education indicated that ESL students gained 6% points on linguistically modified mathematics exams in comparison to non-modified exams. The specific aim of this study was to compare exam scores of ESL to non-ESL nursing students on a standard multiple-choice exam compared to a linguistically modified exam. Current research highlights the needs of ESL nursing students along with the general role of linguistic modification. However, no identified quantitative studies evaluate the role of linguistic modification in nursing education. This study was unique in that it compared four subgroups of nursing students using an experimental method. Utilizing stratified randomization, nursing students were assigned to one of four subgroups. Two controls groups, ESL, and non-ESL students completed a standard exam of 50 questions. Two experimental groups, ESL and non-ESL students, took the same exam but with 50 linguistically modified questions. There were 67 ESL students that took the experimental (linguistically modified) exam. Sixty-eight (68) ESL students completed the control (standard) exam. There were 252 non-ESL students that took the experimental exam and 257 non-ESL students that completed the control exam. Confounding variables were identified as GPA and program type (BSN and ADN). A 2x2 ANCOVA model was used for statistical analysis. The observed mean for the ESL students on the experimental exam was 69.94. The non-ESL students demonstrated an observed mean of 72.08 on the experimental exam. The observed mean for the ESL students on the control exam was 69.34 and non-ESL students 71.61. The combined means for both the experimental and control exam was 71.84 for the non-ESL students and 69.64 for the ESL students. The difference in observed means between the experimental exam and control exam for the ESL students indicate a 0.6% increase in the mean score. The non-ESL students had a 0.48% increase in mean score between the experimental and control exams. Students completed the experimental exam in 10% less time than the students that completed the control exam. The BSN students had a combined 3% increase in mean score over the ADN participants. This research demonstrates several benefits from linguistic modification to nursing education. Students perceive linguistically modified exam questions to be clearer than non-modified questions, linguistic modification resulted in higher exam scores for ESL and non-ESL students, and finally linguistic modification resulted in decreased test completion time.
|
|
Keyword:
Education; English as a second language; English language — Study and teaching — Foreign speakers; Higher Education; Item writing; Linguistic modification; Linguistics; Multiple choice test; Multiple-choice examinations; Nursing; Nursing education; Nursing students; Nursing – Study and teaching; Other Nursing
|
|
URL: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/thesesdissertations/2394
https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3395&context=thesesdissertations
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 36 |
Durch Musik zur Sprache - Musiktherapeutische Sprachförderung in Kita, Schule oder freier Praxis
|
|
|
|
In: Sallat, Stephan [Hrsg.]; Spreer, Markus [Hrsg.]; Glück, Christian W. [Hrsg.]: Sprache professionell fördern. Idstein : Schulz-Kirchner Verlag 2014, S. 444-453 (2014)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 37 |
Testtheoretische Absicherung der ESGRAF 4-9 ; The Psychometric Quality of the ESGRAF 4-9
|
|
|
|
In: Empirische Sonderpädagogik 6 (2014) 4, S. 300-312 (2014)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 38 |
Evaluation eines 2-jährigen Sprachförderprogramms für Grundschüler nicht-deutscher Erstsprache
|
|
|
|
In: Sallat, Stephan [Hrsg.]; Spreer, Markus [Hrsg.]; Glück, Christian W. [Hrsg.]: Sprache professionell fördern. Idstein : Schulz-Kirchner Verlag 2014, S. 368-375 (2014)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 39 |
Förderung von Sprach(lern)bewusstheit und Sprach(lern)kompetenz durch germanische Interkomprehensionsansätze
|
|
|
|
In: Morys, Nancy [Hrsg.]; Kirsch, Claudine [Hrsg.]; de Saint-Georges, Ingrid [Hrsg.]; Gretsch, Gérard [Hrsg.]: Lernen und Lehren in multilingualen Kontexten. Zum Umgang mit sprachlich-kultureller Diversität im Klassenraum. Frankfurt, M. : Lang 2014, S. 31-45. - (Sprache, Mehrsprachigkeit und sozialer Wandel. Language. Multilinguism and Social Change. Langue, multilinguisme et changement social; 22) (2014)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 40 |
Unterstützte Kommunikation in der Sprachtherapie - (Sprach)spezifische Diagnostik bei Kindern mit unzureichender Lautsprache
|
|
|
|
In: Sallat, Stephan [Hrsg.]; Spreer, Markus [Hrsg.]; Glück, Christian W. [Hrsg.]: Sprache professionell fördern. Idstein : Schulz-Kirchner Verlag 2014, S. 283-289 (2014)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
